mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Rigid AI: Towards Natural Human-Machine Symbiosis for Interoperative Surgical Assistance

arXiv 2507.23088 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emerging surgical data science and robotics solutions, especially those designed to provide assistance in situ, require natural human-machine interfaces to fully unlock their potential in providing adaptive and intuitive aid. Contemporary AI-driven solutions remain inherently rigid, offering limited flexibility and restricting natural human-machine interaction in dynamic surgical environments. These solutions rely heavily on extensive task-specific pre-training, fixed object categories, and explicit manual-prompting. This work introduces a novel Perception Agent that leverages speech-integrated prompt-engineered large language models (LLMs), segment anything model (SAM), and any-point tracking foundation models to enable a more natural human-machine interaction in real-time intraoperative surgical assistance. Incorporating a memory repository and two novel mechanisms for segmenting unseen elements, Perception Agent offers the flexibility to segment both known and unseen elements in the surgical scene through intuitive interaction. Incorporating the ability to memorize novel elements for use in future surgeries, this work takes a marked step towards human-machine symbiosis in surgical procedures. Through quantitative analysis on a public dataset, we show that the performance of our agent is on par with considerably more labor-intensive manual-prompting strategies. Qualitatively, we show the flexibility of our agent in segmenting novel elements (instruments, phantom grafts, and gauze) in a custom-curated dataset. By offering natural human-machine interaction and overcoming rigidity, our Perception Agent potentially brings AI-based real-time assistance in dynamic surgical environments closer to reality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.

Builds on

16 of 29 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  2. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  3. 20192017 Robotic Instrument Segmentation Challengecited by 168
  4. 2021Rendezvous: Attention Mechanisms for the Recognition of Surgical Action Triplets in Endoscopic Videoscited by 141
  5. 20202018 Robotic Scene Segmentation Challengecited by 124
  6. 2023SurgicalSAM: Efficient Class Promptable Surgical Instrument Segmentationcited by 104
  7. 2024Surgformer: Surgical Transformer with Hierarchical Temporal Attention for Surgical Phase Recognitioncited by 32
  8. 2020Learning and Reasoning with the Graph Structure Representation in Robotic Surgerycited by 29
  9. 2022Global-Reasoned Multi-Task Learning Model for Surgical Scene Understandingcited by 29
  10. 2023Dynamic Scene Graph Representation for Surgical Videocited by 21
  11. 2022CaRTS: Causality-driven Robot Tool Segmentation from Vision and Kinematics Datacited by 16
  12. 2024Performance and Non-adversarial Robustness of the Segment Anything Model 2 in Surgical Video Segmentationcited by 13
4 more
  1. 2024SegSTRONG-C: Segmenting Surgical Tools Robustly On Non-adversarial Generated Corruptions -- An EndoVis'24 Challengecited by 8
  2. 2022Rethinking Causality-driven Robot Tool Segmentation with Temporal Constraintscited by 5
  3. 2024Towards Robust Surgical Automation via Digital Twin Representations from Foundation Modelscited by 5
  4. 2024Neural Finite-State Machines for Surgical Phase Recognitioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.