Initial Steps in Integrating Large Reasoning and Action Models for Service Composition
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Service composition remains a central challenge in building adaptive and intelligent software systems, often constrained by limited reasoning capabilities or brittle execution mechanisms. This paper explores the integration of two emerging paradigms enabled by large language models: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) and Large Action Models (LAMs). We argue that LRMs address the challenges of semantic reasoning and ecosystem complexity while LAMs excel in dynamic action execution and system interoperability. However, each paradigm has complementary limitations - LRMs lack grounded action capabilities, and LAMs often struggle with deep reasoning. We propose an integrated LRM-LAM architectural framework as a promising direction for advancing automated service composition. Such a system can reason about service requirements and constraints while dynamically executing workflows, thus bridging the gap between intention and execution. This integration has the potential to transform service composition into a fully automated, user-friendly process driven by high-level natural language intent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.
Builds on
20 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 19
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
- 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMscited by 338
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 293
7 more
- 2023FireAct: Toward Language Agent Fine-tuningcited by 256
- 2023RestGPT: Connecting Large Language Models with Real-World RESTful APIscited by 135
- 2024ScreenAgent: A Vision Language Model-driven Computer Control Agentcited by 102
- 2025Reasoning Language Models: A Blueprintcited by 42
- 2024Large Action Models: From Inception to Implementationcited by 18
- 2023Let's Chat to Find the APIs: Connecting Human, LLM and Knowledge Graph through AI Chaincited by 7
- 2023Service Composition in the ChatGPT Eracited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Adopting Large Language Models to Automated System Integration
- 2025Exploring the Necessity of Reasoning in LLM-based Agent Scenarios
- 2026A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Reasoning: From Single-Model to Multi-Agent Paradigms
- 2026Characterizing Large Language Model Agentic Workflows: A Study on N8n Ecosystem
- 2026Looped Language Models Improve Compositional Tool Calling
- 2025A Study on Thinking Patterns of Large Reasoning Models in Code Generation
- 2026Large Language Models for Fuzz Testing in Microservices: A Systematic Literature Review ↗
- 2025LLM+AL: Bridging Large Language Models and Action Languages for Complex Reasoning about Actions