mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Supervised Ultrasound-Video Segmentation with Feature Prediction and 3D Localised Loss

arXiv 2507.18424 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Acquiring and annotating large datasets in ultrasound imaging is challenging due to low contrast, high noise, and susceptibility to artefacts. This process requires significant time and clinical expertise. Self-supervised learning (SSL) offers a promising solution by leveraging unlabelled data to learn useful representations, enabling improved segmentation performance when annotated data is limited. Recent state-of-the-art developments in SSL for video data include V-JEPA, a framework solely based on feature prediction, avoiding pixel level reconstruction or negative samples. We hypothesise that V-JEPA is well-suited to ultrasound imaging, as it is less sensitive to noisy pixel-level detail while effectively leveraging temporal information. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to adopt V-JEPA for ultrasound video data. Similar to other patch-based masking SSL techniques such as VideoMAE, V-JEPA is well-suited to ViT-based models. However, ViTs can underperform on small medical datasets due to lack of inductive biases, limited spatial locality and absence of hierarchical feature learning. To improve locality understanding, we propose a novel 3D localisation auxiliary task to improve locality in ViT representations during V-JEPA pre-training. Our results show V-JEPA with our auxiliary task improves segmentation performance significantly across various frozen encoder configurations, with gains up to 3.4% using 100% and up to 8.35% using only 10% of the training data.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
  4. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
  5. 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 694
  6. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
  7. 2019Deep Learning for Segmentation using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiographycited by 244
  8. 2021Efficient Training of Visual Transformers with Small Datasetscited by 108
  9. 2023USFM: A Universal Ultrasound Foundation Model Generalized to Tasks and Organs towards Label Efficient Image Analysiscited by 68
  10. 2023Understanding Why ViT Trains Badly on Small Datasets: An Intuitive Perspectivecited by 28
  11. 2020Self-supervised Representation Learning for Ultrasound Videocited by 25
  12. 2022Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Representation Learning for Fetal Ultrasoundcited by 8
3 more
  1. 2023Enhancing Performance of Vision Transformers on Small Datasets through Local Inductive Bias Incorporationcited by 6
  2. 2023Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Lung Ultrasound Videoscited by 4
  3. 2025A Self-Supervised Framework for Improved Generalisability in Ultrasound B-mode Image Segmentationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.