mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncovering Critical Features for Deepfake Detection through the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis

arXiv 2507.15636 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in deepfake technology have created increasingly convincing synthetic media that poses significant challenges to information integrity and social trust. While current detection methods show promise, their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, and the large sizes of their models make them challenging to deploy in resource-limited environments. This study investigates the application of the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) to deepfake detection, aiming to identify the key features crucial for recognizing deepfakes. We examine how neural networks can be efficiently pruned while maintaining high detection accuracy. Through extensive experiments with MesoNet, CNN-5, and ResNet-18 architectures on the OpenForensic and FaceForensics++ datasets, we find that deepfake detection networks contain winning tickets, i.e., subnetworks, that preserve performance even at substantial sparsity levels. Our results indicate that MesoNet retains 56.2% accuracy at 80% sparsity on the OpenForensic dataset, with only 3,000 parameters, which is about 90% of its baseline accuracy (62.6%). The results also show that our proposed LTH-based iterative magnitude pruning approach consistently outperforms one-shot pruning methods. Using Grad-CAM visualization, we analyze how pruned networks maintain their focus on critical facial regions for deepfake detection. Additionally, we demonstrate the transferability of winning tickets across datasets, suggesting potential for efficient, deployable deepfake detection systems.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  4. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  5. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  6. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
  7. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
  8. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 544
  9. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
  10. 2021Neural Geometric Level of Detail: Real-time Rendering with Implicit 3D Shapescited by 426
  11. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  12. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 171
7 more
  1. 2018FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Facescited by 119
  2. 2022Coarsening the Granularity: Towards Structurally Sparse Lottery Ticketscited by 27
  3. 2024Pruning for Robust Concept Erasing in Diffusion Modelscited by 22
  4. 2023Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Modelscited by 21
  5. 2020RTMobile: Beyond Real-Time Mobile Acceleration of RNNs for Speech Recognitioncited by 19
  6. 20243D Point Cloud Network Pruning: When Some Weights Do not Mattercited by 3
  7. 2024Adaptive Knowledge Distillation for Classification of Hand Images using Explainable Vision Transformerscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.