mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the robustness of modeling grounded word learning through a child's egocentric input

arXiv 2507.14749 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2025cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

What insights can machine learning bring to understanding human language acquisition? Large language and multimodal models have achieved remarkable capabilities, but their reliance on massive training datasets creates a fundamental mismatch with children, who succeed in acquiring language from comparatively limited input. To help bridge this gap, researchers have increasingly trained neural networks using data similar in quantity and quality to children's input. Taking this approach to the limit, Vong et al. (2024) showed that a multimodal neural network trained on 61 hours of visual and linguistic input extracted from just one child's developmental experience could acquire word-referent mappings. However, whether this approach's success reflects the idiosyncrasies of a single child's experience, or whether it would show consistent and robust learning patterns across multiple children's experiences was not explored. In this article, we applied automated speech transcription methods to the entirety of the SAYCam dataset, consisting of over 500 hours of video data spread across all three children. Using these automated transcriptions, we generated multi-modal vision-and-language datasets for both training and evaluation, and explored a range of neural network configurations to examine the robustness of simulated word learning. Our findings demonstrate that networks trained on automatically transcribed data from each child can acquire word-referent mappings, generalizing across videos, children, and image domains. These results validate the robustness of multimodal neural networks for grounded word learning, while highlighting the individual differences that emerge in how models learn when trained on each child's developmental experiences.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  4. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  7. 2023WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audiocited by 320
  8. 2018Jointly Discovering Visual Objects and Spoken Words from Raw Sensory Inputcited by 81
  9. 2020Self-supervised learning through the eyes of a childcited by 61
  10. 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
  11. 2021Visually grounded models of spoken language: A survey of datasets, architectures and evaluation techniquescited by 32
  12. 2025BabyLM Turns 3: Call for papers for the 2025 BabyLM workshopcited by 24
6 more
  1. 2023Learning high-level visual representations from a child's perspective without strong inductive biasescited by 22
  2. 2019Language learning using Speech to Image retrievalcited by 21
  3. 2023Visual Grounding Helps Learn Word Meanings in Low-Data Regimescited by 16
  4. 2024The BabyView dataset: High-resolution egocentric videos of infants' and young children's everyday experiencescited by 15
  5. 2024A systematic investigation of learnability from single child linguistic inputcited by 8
  6. 2024Lexicon-Level Contrastive Visual-Grounding Improves Language Modelingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.