A systematic investigation of learnability from single child linguistic input
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models (LMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in generating linguistically coherent text, sparking discussions about their relevance to understanding human language learnability. However, a significant gap exists between the training data for these models and the linguistic input a child receives. LMs are typically trained on data that is orders of magnitude larger and fundamentally different from child-directed speech (Warstadt and Bowman, 2022; Warstadt et al., 2023; Frank, 2023a). Addressing this discrepancy, our research focuses on training LMs on subsets of a single child's linguistic input. Previously, Wang, Vong, Kim, and Lake (2023) found that LMs trained in this setting can form syntactic and semantic word clusters and develop sensitivity to certain linguistic phenomena, but they only considered LSTMs and simpler neural networks trained from just one single-child dataset. Here, to examine the robustness of learnability from single-child input, we systematically train six different model architectures on five datasets (3 single-child and 2 baselines). We find that the models trained on single-child datasets showed consistent results that matched with previous work, underscoring the robustness of forming meaningful syntactic and semantic representations from a subset of a child's linguistic input.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.
Builds on
7 of 29 references.
References · 7
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2022What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisitioncited by 97
- 2023Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 92
- 2021The MultiBERTs: BERT Reproductions for Robustness Analysiscited by 89
- 2023How poor is the stimulus? Evaluating hierarchical generalization in neural networks trained on child-directed speechcited by 22
- 2023Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisitioncited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2024Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?cited by 24
- 2024Language Models as Models of Languagecited by 24
- 2024The BabyView dataset: High-resolution egocentric videos of infants' and young children's everyday experiencescited by 15
- 2025Child-Directed Language Does Not Consistently Boost Syntax Learning in Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025BabyVLM: Data-Efficient Pretraining of VLMs Inspired by Infant Learningcited by 6
- 2025On the robustness of modeling grounded word learning through a child's egocentric inputcited by 4
- 2025Do Blind Spots Matter for Word-Referent Mapping? A Computational Study with Infant Egocentric Videocited by 0
- 2026Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMscited by 0
- 2026Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMs31 May 2026
- 2025Do Blind Spots Matter for Word-Referent Mapping? A Computational Study with Infant Egocentric Video13 Nov 2025
- 2025On the robustness of modeling grounded word learning through a child's egocentric input19 Jul 2025
- 2025Child-Directed Language Does Not Consistently Boost Syntax Learning in Language Models29 May 2025
- 2025BabyVLM: Data-Efficient Pretraining of VLMs Inspired by Infant Learning13 Apr 2025
- 2024Language Models as Models of Language13 Aug 2024
- 2024Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?7 Aug 2024
- 2024The BabyView dataset: High-resolution egocentric videos of infants' and young children's everyday experiences14 Jun 2024