mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Question-Answer Extraction from Scientific Articles Using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models

arXiv 2507.13827 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When deciding to read an article or incorporate it into their research, scholars often seek to quickly identify and understand its main ideas. In this paper, we aim to extract these key concepts and contributions from scientific articles in the form of Question and Answer (QA) pairs. We propose two distinct approaches for generating QAs. The first approach involves selecting salient paragraphs, using a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate questions, ranking these questions by the likelihood of obtaining meaningful answers, and subsequently generating answers. This method relies exclusively on the content of the articles. However, assessing an article's novelty typically requires comparison with the existing literature. Therefore, our second approach leverages a Knowledge Graph (KG) for QA generation. We construct a KG by fine-tuning an Entity Relationship (ER) extraction model on scientific articles and using it to build the graph. We then employ a salient triplet extraction method to select the most pertinent ERs per article, utilizing metrics such as the centrality of entities based on a triplet TF-IDF-like measure. This measure assesses the saliency of a triplet based on its importance within the article compared to its prevalence in the literature. For evaluation, we generate QAs using both approaches and have them assessed by Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) through a set of predefined metrics to evaluate the quality of both questions and answers. Our evaluations demonstrate that the KG-based approach effectively captures the main ideas discussed in the articles. Furthermore, our findings indicate that fine-tuning the ER extraction model on our scientific corpus is crucial for extracting high-quality triplets from such documents.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2025.

Builds on

11 of 48 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
  3. 2024Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 146
  4. 2020TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documentscited by 136
  5. 2021Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 118
  6. 2023Revisiting Relation Extraction in the era of Large Language Modelscited by 102
  7. 2021Retrieval-guided Counterfactual Generation for QAcited by 29
  8. 2022A sequence-to-sequence approach for document-level relation extractioncited by 25
  9. 2021A Simple but Effective Bidirectional Framework for Relational Triple Extractioncited by 14
  10. 2021Leveraging Information Bottleneck for Scientific Document Summarizationcited by 13
  11. 2017Scientific document summarization via citation contextualization and scientific discoursecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.