Commuting Distance Regularization for Timescale-Dependent Label Inconsistency in EEG Emotion Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we address the often-overlooked issue of Timescale Dependent Label Inconsistency (TsDLI) in training neural network models for EEG-based human emotion recognition. To mitigate TsDLI and enhance model generalization and explainability, we propose two novel regularization strategies: Local Variation Loss (LVL) and Local-Global Consistency Loss (LGCL). Both methods incorporate classical mathematical principles--specifically, functions of bounded variation and commute-time distances--within a graph theoretic framework. Complementing our regularizers, we introduce a suite of new evaluation metrics that better capture the alignment between temporally local predictions and their associated global emotion labels. We validate our approach through comprehensive experiments on two widely used EEG emotion datasets, DREAMER and DEAP, across a range of neural architectures including LSTM and transformer-based models. Performance is assessed using five distinct metrics encompassing both quantitative accuracy and qualitative consistency. Results consistently show that our proposed methods outperform state-of-the-art baselines, delivering superior aggregate performance and offering a principled trade-off between interpretability and predictive power under label inconsistency. Notably, LVL achieves the best aggregate rank across all benchmarked backbones and metrics, while LGCL frequently ranks the second, highlighting the effectiveness of our framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.
Builds on
20 of 55 references.
References · 20
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2016EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Network for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfacescited by 628
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
- 2017A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networkscited by 513
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
8 more
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
- 2017On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classificationcited by 68
- 2022EEG based Emotion Recognition: A Tutorial and Reviewcited by 43
- 2024NoisyGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks under Label Noisecited by 17
- 2021Neural Optimization: Understanding Trade-offs with Pareto Theorycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.