mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Evaluating Fake Music Detection Performance Under Audio Augmentations

arXiv 2507.10447 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2025cs.SD cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid advancement of generative audio models, distinguishing between human-composed and generated music is becoming increasingly challenging. As a response, models for detecting fake music have been proposed. In this work, we explore the robustness of such systems under audio augmentations. To evaluate model generalization, we constructed a dataset consisting of both real and synthetic music generated using several systems. We then apply a range of audio transformations and analyze how they affect classification accuracy. We test the performance of a recent state-of-the-art musical deepfake detection model in the presence of audio augmentations. The performance of the model decreases significantly even with the introduction of light augmentations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.

Builds on

7 of 8 references.

References · 7

  1. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,247
  2. 2023Simple and Controllable Music Generationcited by 484
  3. 2022Automatic speaker verification spoofing and deepfake detection using wav2vec 2.0 and data augmentationcited by 112
  4. 2025YuE: Scaling Open Foundation Models for Long-Form Music Generationcited by 70
  5. 2024XLSR-Mamba: A Dual-Column Bidirectional State Space Model for Spoofing Attack Detectioncited by 29
  6. 2024SONICS: Synthetic Or Not -- Identifying Counterfeit Songscited by 21
  7. 2024Detecting music deepfakes is easy but actually hardcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.