Taming Modern Point Tracking for Speckle Tracking Echocardiography via Impartial Motion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate motion estimation for tracking deformable tissues in echocardiography is essential for precise cardiac function measurements. While traditional methods like block matching or optical flow struggle with intricate cardiac motion, modern point tracking approaches remain largely underexplored in this domain. This work investigates the potential of state-of-the-art (SOTA) point tracking methods for ultrasound, with a focus on echocardiography. Although these novel approaches demonstrate strong performance in general videos, their effectiveness and generalizability in echocardiography remain limited. By analyzing cardiac motion throughout the heart cycle in real B-mode ultrasound videos, we identify that a directional motion bias across different views is affecting the existing training strategies. To mitigate this, we refine the training procedure and incorporate a set of tailored augmentations to reduce the bias and enhance tracking robustness and generalization through impartial cardiac motion. We also propose a lightweight network leveraging multi-scale cost volumes from spatial context alone to challenge the advanced spatiotemporal point tracking models. Experiments demonstrate that fine-tuning with our strategies significantly improves models' performances over their baselines, even for out-of-distribution (OOD) cases. For instance, EchoTracker boosts overall position accuracy by 60.7% and reduces median trajectory error by 61.5% across heart cycle phases. Interestingly, several point tracking models fail to outperform our proposed simple model in terms of tracking accuracy and generalization, reflecting their limitations when applied to echocardiography. Nevertheless, clinical evaluation reveals that these methods improve GLS measurements, aligning more closely with expert-validated, semi-automated tools and thus demonstrating better reproducibility in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.
Builds on
19 of 41 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2016Real-Time Single Image and Video Super-Resolution Using an Efficient Sub-Pixel Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 1,204
- 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 968
- 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 784
- 2023CoTracker: It is Better to Track Togethercited by 522
- 2023TAPIR: Tracking Any Point with per-frame Initialization and temporal Refinementcited by 287
- 2023PointOdyssey: A Large-Scale Synthetic Dataset for Long-Term Point Trackingcited by 276
- 2022TAP-Vid: A Benchmark for Tracking Any Point in a Videocited by 263
- 2022Particle Video Revisited: Tracking Through Occlusions Using Point Trajectoriescited by 217
- 2024BootsTAP: Bootstrapped Training for Tracking-Any-Pointcited by 120
- 2024Local All-Pair Correspondence for Point Trackingcited by 80
7 more
- 2024DINO-Tracker: Taming DINO for Self-Supervised Point Tracking in a Single Videocited by 64
- 2024TAPTR: Tracking Any Point with Transformers as Detectioncited by 45
- 2025Track-On: Transformer-based Online Point Tracking with Memorycited by 21
- 2024EchoTracker: Advancing Myocardial Point Tracking in Echocardiographycited by 11
- 2023Continuous 3D Myocardial Motion Tracking via Echocardiographycited by 5
- 2025Low Complexity Point Tracking of the Myocardium in 2D Echocardiographycited by 5
- 2024PIPsUS: Self-Supervised Point Tracking in Ultrasoundcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.