mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Critical Representation Fine-tuning

arXiv 2507.10085 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Representation Fine-tuning (ReFT), a recently proposed Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method, has attracted widespread attention for significantly improving parameter efficiency by editing representation space alone. In this work, we investigate applying ReFT to complex reasoning tasks. However, directly using the native ReFT method, which modifies fixed representations at the beginning and end of each layer, yields suboptimal performance, as these fixed-position representations have uncertain impact on the outputs. We observe that, in complex reasoning tasks, there often exist certain critical representations. These representations either integrate significant information from preceding layers or regulate subsequent layer representations. Through layer-by-layer propagation, they exert a substantial influence on the final output. Naturally, fine-tuning these critical representations has the potential to greatly enhance reasoning performance. Building upon these insights, we propose Critical Representation Fine-Tuning (CRFT), a novel method that identifies and optimizes these critical representations through information flow analysis. CRFT operates within a supervised learning framework, dynamically optimizing critical representations in a low-rank linear subspace while freezing the base model. The effectiveness and efficiency of our method are validated across eight benchmarks for arithmetic and commonsense reasoning, using LLaMA and Mistral model families. Furthermore, our method also adapts effectively to few-shot settings, boosting one-shot accuracy by 16.4%. Our work highlights the untapped potential of representation-level optimization for CoT reasoning, offering a lightweight yet powerful alternative to traditional PEFT methods.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

Builds on

29 of 41 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  5. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  6. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  7. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  8. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  9. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
  10. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 650
  11. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
  12. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
17 more
  1. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  2. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 350
  3. 2023LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 324
  4. 2023MathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language Modelscited by 236
  5. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 236
  6. 2018A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 223
  7. 2022Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Implicitly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta-Optimizerscited by 204
  8. 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 197
  9. 2023Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Futurecited by 184
  10. 2023Tell Your Model Where to Attend: Post-hoc Attention Steering for LLMscited by 91
  11. 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 79
  12. 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 74
  13. 2018WorldTree: A Corpus of Explanation Graphs for Elementary Science Questions supporting Multi-Hop Inferencecited by 60
  14. 2019SocialIQA: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactionscited by 37
  15. 2024Advancing Parameter Efficiency in Fine-tuning via Representation Editingcited by 37
  16. 2024The LLM Language Network: A Neuroscientific Approach for Identifying Causally Task-Relevant Unitscited by 34
  17. 2024Focus on Your Question! Interpreting and Mitigating Toxic CoT Problems in Commonsense Reasoningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning
  2. 2026Reasoning Quality Emerges Early: Data Curation for Reasoning Models
  3. 2026The Fine-Tuning Trap: Evaluating Negative Transfer and the Role of PEFT in Sub-1B Mathematical Reasoning
  4. 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
  5. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  6. 2026On the Role of Reasoning Patterns in the Generalization Discrepancy of Long Chain-of-Thought Supervised Fine-Tuning
  7. 2025Critique Fine-Tuning: Learning to Critique is More Effective than Learning to Imitate
  8. 2025HEFT: A Coarse-to-Fine Hierarchy for Enhancing the Efficiency and Accuracy of Language Model Reasoning