mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Efficiency of Training Robust Decision Trees

arXiv 2507.10048 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning gets adopted into the industry quickly, trustworthiness is increasingly in focus. Yet, efficiency and sustainability of robust training pipelines still have to be established. In this work, we consider a simple pipeline for training adversarially robust decision trees and investigate the efficiency of each step. Our pipeline consists of three stages. Firstly, we choose the perturbation size automatically for each dataset. For that, we introduce a simple algorithm, instead of relying on intuition or prior work. Moreover, we show that the perturbation size can be estimated from smaller models than the one intended for full training, and thus significant gains in efficiency can be achieved. Secondly, we train state-of-the-art adversarial training methods and evaluate them regarding both their training time and adversarial accuracy. Thirdly, we certify the robustness of each of the models thus obtained and investigate the time required for this. We find that verification time, which is critical to the efficiency of the full pipeline, is not correlated with training time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  6. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  7. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  8. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  9. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
  10. 2015Evasion and Hardening of Tree Ensemble Classifierscited by 44
  11. 2019Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 40
  12. 2021On the Certified Robustness for Ensemble Models and Beyondcited by 40
10 more
  1. 2024The SCIP Optimization Suite 9.0cited by 37
  2. 2019Robustness Verification of Tree-based Modelscited by 33
  3. 2019Provably Robust Boosted Decision Stumps and Trees against Adversarial Attackscited by 26
  4. 2020Efficient Training of Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 24
  5. 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awarenesscited by 15
  6. 2019Treant: Training Evasion-Aware Decision Treescited by 12
  7. 2019On the Robustness of Deep K-Nearest Neighborscited by 10
  8. 2020An Efficient Adversarial Attack for Tree Ensemblescited by 9
  9. 2018Evading classifiers in discrete domains with provable optimality guaranteescited by 7
  10. 2022Towards Generating Adversarial Examples on Mixed-type Datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.