AICrypto: Evaluating Cryptography Capabilities of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We build AICrypto, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the cryptography capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The benchmark comprises 135 multiple-choice questions, 150 capture-the-flag challenges, and 30 proof problems, covering a broad range of skills from knowledge memorization to vulnerability exploitation and formal reasoning. All tasks are carefully reviewed or constructed by cryptography experts to improve correctness and rigor. For each proof problem, we provide detailed scoring rubrics and reference solutions that enable automated grading, achieving high correlation with human expert evaluations. We introduce strong human expert performance baselines for comparison across all task types. Our evaluation of 17 leading LLMs reveals that state-of-the-art models match or even surpass human experts in memorizing cryptographic concepts, exploiting common vulnerabilities, and routine proofs. However, our analysis reveals that they still lack a deep understanding of abstract mathematical concepts and struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning and dynamic analysis. We hope this work could provide insights for future research on LLMs in cryptographic applications. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/wangyu-ovo/aicrypto-agent.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debatecited by 29
- 2026CREBench: Evaluating Large Language Models in Cryptographic Binary Reverse Engineeringcited by 3
- 2026CESBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Cryptographic Engineering Security for IoT Devicescited by 0
- 2026AwarenessBench: Assessing Cognitive Capabilities of Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026AwarenessBench: Assessing Cognitive Capabilities of Language Models28 Sep 2026
- 2026CESBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Cryptographic Engineering Security for IoT Devices18 Sep 2026
- 2026CREBench: Evaluating Large Language Models in Cryptographic Binary Reverse Engineering4 Apr 2026
- 2025Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate14 Sep 2025