Surprisingly High Redundancy in Electronic Structure Data Across Materials Explained by Low Intrinsic Dimensionality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) models for electronic structure typically rely on large datasets generated by computationally expensive Kohn-Sham density functional theory calculations, as it is not known a priori which portions of the data are essential for accurate learning. Here, we reveal significant redundancies in electronic structure datasets across diverse material systems and attribute them to the low intrinsic dimensionality of the underlying data. We show that even random pruning can substantially reduce dataset size with minimal degradation in predictive accuracy. Moreover, a state-of-the-art coverage-based pruning strategy that samples data across all learning difficulties almost always preserves chemical accuracy and maintains model generalizability while using up to two orders of magnitude less data and reducing training time by a factor of three or more. We further demonstrate that the essential electronic structure information lies on a low-dimensional, non-linear manifold, providing a potential geometric explanation for the observed prunability. These observations are consistent with the predominance of local atomic environments in determining electronic properties, as suggested by nearsightedness arguments, and indicate that large-scale datasets may contain highly overlapping information. Our findings challenge the prevailing assumption that such extensive datasets are necessary for accurate ML-based electronic structure predictions and open a path toward identifying minimal, representative datasets for each material class.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.
Builds on
25 of 108 references.
References · 25
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 226
- 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 147
13 more
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 133
- 2022Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Ratescited by 117
- 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 82
- 2021RETRIEVE: Coreset Selection for Efficient and Robust Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 74
- 2016By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learningcited by 67
- 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2021Equivariant graph neural networks for fast electron density estimation of molecules, liquids, and solidscited by 25
- 2024Hardness of Learning Neural Networks under the Manifold Hypothesiscited by 18
- 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
- 2019Deep Density: circumventing the Kohn-Sham equations via symmetry preserving neural networkscited by 10
- 2024Beyond Efficiency: Molecular Data Pruning for Enhanced Generalizationcited by 9
- 2024Image Super-resolution Inspired Electron Density Predictioncited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.