Catastrophic Forgetting Mitigation Through Plateau Phase Activity Profiling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Catastrophic forgetting in deep neural networks occurs when learning new tasks degrades performance on previously learned tasks due to knowledge overwriting. Among the approaches to mitigate this issue, regularization techniques aim to identify and constrain "important" parameters to preserve previous knowledge. In the highly nonconvex optimization landscape of deep learning, we propose a novel perspective: tracking parameters during the final training plateau is more effective than monitoring them throughout the entire training process. We argue that parameters that exhibit higher activity (movement and variability) during this plateau reveal directions in the loss landscape that are relatively flat, making them suitable for adaptation to new tasks while preserving knowledge from previous ones. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that this approach achieves superior performance in balancing catastrophic forgetting mitigation with strong performance on newly learned tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.
Builds on
32 of 43 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
20 more
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
- 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 742
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 681
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 614
- 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 571
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
- 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 360
- 2017Variational Continual Learningcited by 339
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 280
- 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
- 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 188
- 2020Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual Learningcited by 180
- 2022Parameter-efficient Model Adaptation for Vision Transformerscited by 81
- 2023Simple and Fast Group Robustness by Automatic Feature Reweightingcited by 68
- 2023Catastrophic Forgetting in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Taxonomycited by 24
- 2019Continual Learning in Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2025LORENZA: Enhancing Generalization in Low-Rank Gradient LLM Training via Efficient Zeroth-Order Adaptive SAMcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.