Learning from positive and unlabeled examples -Finite size sample bounds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
PU (Positive Unlabeled) learning is a variant of supervised classification learning in which the only labels revealed to the learner are of positively labeled instances. PU learning arises in many real-world applications. Most existing work relies on the simplifying assumptions that the positively labeled training data is drawn from the restriction of the data generating distribution to positively labeled instances and/or that the proportion of positively labeled points (a.k.a. the class prior) is known apriori to the learner. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the statistical complexity of PU learning under a wider range of setups. Unlike most prior work, our study does not assume that the class prior is known to the learner. We prove upper and lower bounds on the required sample sizes (of both the positively labeled and the unlabeled samples).
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.
Builds on
9 of 44 references.
References · 9
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
- 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
- 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
- 2020Non-Negative Bregman Divergence Minimization for Deep Direct Density Ratio Estimationcited by 45
- 2016Theoretical Comparisons of Positive-Unlabeled Learning against Positive-Negative Learningcited by 41
- 2018Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
- 2016Estimating the class prior and posterior from noisy positives and unlabeled datacited by 25
- 2020Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data with Arbitrary Positive Shiftcited by 23
- 2018Instance-Dependent PU Learning by Bayesian Optimal Relabelingcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Learning from Synthetic Data: Limitations of ERMcited by 3
- 2026Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shiftcited by 1
- 2026Active learning from positive and unlabeled examplescited by 0
- 2026Generating Causal Temporal Interaction Graphs for Counterfactual Validation of Temporal Link Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Surprises in Proper Positive-Only Learningcited by 0
- 2026Minimax bounds for watermarked and masked recursive discrete distribution estimationcited by 0
- 2026Minimax bounds for watermarked and masked recursive discrete distribution estimation31 Aug 2026
- 2026Surprises in Proper Positive-Only Learning26 Jun 2026
- 2026Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift23 Jun 2026
- 2026Generating Causal Temporal Interaction Graphs for Counterfactual Validation of Temporal Link Prediction2 Feb 2026
- 2026Active learning from positive and unlabeled examples2 Feb 2026
- 2026Learning from Synthetic Data: Limitations of ERM21 Jan 2026