A Principled Framework for Multi-View Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrastive Learning (CL), a leading paradigm in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), typically relies on pairs of data views generated through augmentation. While multiple augmentations per instance (more than two) improve generalization in supervised learning, current CL methods handle additional views suboptimally by simply aggregating different pairwise objectives. This approach suffers from four critical limitations: (L1) it utilizes multiple optimization terms per data point resulting to conflicting objectives, (L2) it fails to model all interactions across views and data points, (L3) it inherits fundamental limitations (e.g. alignment-uniformity coupling) from pairwise CL losses, and (L4) it prevents fully realizing the benefits of increased view multiplicity observed in supervised settings. We address these limitations through two novel loss functions: MV-InfoNCE, which extends InfoNCE to incorporate all possible view interactions simultaneously in one term per data point, and MV-DHEL, which decouples alignment from uniformity across views while scaling interaction complexity with view multiplicity. Both approaches are theoretically grounded - we prove they asymptotically optimize for alignment of all views and uniformity, providing principled extensions to multi-view contrastive learning. Our empirical results on ImageNet1K and three other datasets demonstrate that our methods consistently outperform existing multi-view approaches and effectively scale with increasing view multiplicity. We also apply our objectives to multimodal data and show that, in contrast to other contrastive objectives, they can scale beyond just two modalities. Most significantly, ablation studies reveal that MV-DHEL with five or more views effectively mitigates dimensionality collapse by fully utilizing the embedding space, thereby delivering multi-view benefits observed in supervised learning.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.
Builds on
39 of 51 references.
References · 39
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,342
- 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
27 more
- 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
- 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 734
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
- 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
- 2020Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 279
- 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
- 2022RankMe: Assessing the downstream performance of pretrained self-supervised representations by their rankcited by 153
- 2021Decoupled Contrastive Learningcited by 143
- 2022VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Featurescited by 118
- 2021Multi-level Feature Learning for Contrastive Multi-view Clusteringcited by 73
- 2022Dual Temperature Helps Contrastive Learning Without Many Negative Samples: Towards Understanding and Simplifying MoCocited by 52
- 2020Unsupervised Feature Learning by Cross-Level Instance-Group Discriminationcited by 51
- 2021Contrastive Multimodal Fusion with TupleInfoNCEcited by 43
- 2022How Much Data Are Augmentations Worth? An Investigation into Scaling Laws, Invariance, and Implicit Regularizationcited by 40
- 2021Drawing Multiple Augmentation Samples Per Image During Training Efficiently Decreases Test Errorcited by 33
- 2021Grounding inductive biases in natural images:invariance stems from variations in datacited by 27
- 2024MERBench: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Emotion Recognitioncited by 27
- 2022The good, the bad and the ugly sides of data augmentation: An implicit spectral regularization perspectivecited by 24
- 2022M-SENA: An Integrated Platform for Multimodal Sentiment Analysiscited by 21
- 2023EMP-SSL: Towards Self-Supervised Learning in One Training Epochcited by 19
- 2022TriCoLo: Trimodal Contrastive Loss for Text to Shape Retrievalcited by 18
- 2024Poly-View Contrastive Learningcited by 9
- 2023Adaptive Multi-head Contrastive Learningcited by 8
- 2024Contrasting Multiple Representations with the Multi-Marginal Matching Gapcited by 8
- 2024Bridging Mini-Batch and Asymptotic Analysis in Contrastive Learning: From InfoNCE to Kernel-Based Lossescited by 7
- 2023MultiZoo & MultiBench: A Standardized Toolkit for Multimodal Deep Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Toward Enhancing Representation Learning in Federated Multi-Task Settingscited by 2
- 2026EGA: Adapting Frozen Encoders for Vector Search with Bounded Out-of-Distribution Degradationcited by 0
- 2026An Analysis of Self-supervised Pre-training with Dependent Samplescited by 0
- 2026HRIL: Learning Multimodal Synergy via Higher-Order Tensor Modelingcited by 0
- 2026HRIL: Learning Multimodal Synergy via Higher-Order Tensor Modeling8 Oct 2026
- 2026An Analysis of Self-supervised Pre-training with Dependent Samples4 Sep 2026
- 2026EGA: Adapting Frozen Encoders for Vector Search with Bounded Out-of-Distribution Degradation7 May 2026
- 2026Toward Enhancing Representation Learning in Federated Multi-Task Settings2 Feb 2026