mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Principled Framework for Multi-View Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2507.06979 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive Learning (CL), a leading paradigm in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), typically relies on pairs of data views generated through augmentation. While multiple augmentations per instance (more than two) improve generalization in supervised learning, current CL methods handle additional views suboptimally by simply aggregating different pairwise objectives. This approach suffers from four critical limitations: (L1) it utilizes multiple optimization terms per data point resulting to conflicting objectives, (L2) it fails to model all interactions across views and data points, (L3) it inherits fundamental limitations (e.g. alignment-uniformity coupling) from pairwise CL losses, and (L4) it prevents fully realizing the benefits of increased view multiplicity observed in supervised settings. We address these limitations through two novel loss functions: MV-InfoNCE, which extends InfoNCE to incorporate all possible view interactions simultaneously in one term per data point, and MV-DHEL, which decouples alignment from uniformity across views while scaling interaction complexity with view multiplicity. Both approaches are theoretically grounded - we prove they asymptotically optimize for alignment of all views and uniformity, providing principled extensions to multi-view contrastive learning. Our empirical results on ImageNet1K and three other datasets demonstrate that our methods consistently outperform existing multi-view approaches and effectively scale with increasing view multiplicity. We also apply our objectives to multimodal data and show that, in contrast to other contrastive objectives, they can scale beyond just two modalities. Most significantly, ablation studies reveal that MV-DHEL with five or more views effectively mitigates dimensionality collapse by fully utilizing the embedding space, thereby delivering multi-view benefits observed in supervised learning.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

Builds on

39 of 51 references.

References · 39

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  9. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  10. 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,342
  11. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  12. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
27 more
  1. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
  2. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 734
  3. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
  4. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  5. 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
  6. 2020Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 279
  7. 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
  8. 2022RankMe: Assessing the downstream performance of pretrained self-supervised representations by their rankcited by 153
  9. 2021Decoupled Contrastive Learningcited by 143
  10. 2022VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Featurescited by 118
  11. 2021Multi-level Feature Learning for Contrastive Multi-view Clusteringcited by 73
  12. 2022Dual Temperature Helps Contrastive Learning Without Many Negative Samples: Towards Understanding and Simplifying MoCocited by 52
  13. 2020Unsupervised Feature Learning by Cross-Level Instance-Group Discriminationcited by 51
  14. 2021Contrastive Multimodal Fusion with TupleInfoNCEcited by 43
  15. 2022How Much Data Are Augmentations Worth? An Investigation into Scaling Laws, Invariance, and Implicit Regularizationcited by 40
  16. 2021Drawing Multiple Augmentation Samples Per Image During Training Efficiently Decreases Test Errorcited by 33
  17. 2021Grounding inductive biases in natural images:invariance stems from variations in datacited by 27
  18. 2024MERBench: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Emotion Recognitioncited by 27
  19. 2022The good, the bad and the ugly sides of data augmentation: An implicit spectral regularization perspectivecited by 24
  20. 2022M-SENA: An Integrated Platform for Multimodal Sentiment Analysiscited by 21
  21. 2023EMP-SSL: Towards Self-Supervised Learning in One Training Epochcited by 19
  22. 2022TriCoLo: Trimodal Contrastive Loss for Text to Shape Retrievalcited by 18
  23. 2024Poly-View Contrastive Learningcited by 9
  24. 2023Adaptive Multi-head Contrastive Learningcited by 8
  25. 2024Contrasting Multiple Representations with the Multi-Marginal Matching Gapcited by 8
  26. 2024Bridging Mini-Batch and Asymptotic Analysis in Contrastive Learning: From InfoNCE to Kernel-Based Lossescited by 7
  27. 2023MultiZoo & MultiBench: A Standardized Toolkit for Multimodal Deep Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.