Deprecating Benchmarks: Criteria and Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As frontier artificial intelligence (AI) models rapidly advance, benchmarks are integral to comparing different models and measuring their progress in different task-specific domains. However, there is a lack of guidance on when and how benchmarks should be deprecated once they cease to effectively perform their purpose. This risks benchmark scores over-valuing model capabilities, or worse, obscuring capabilities and safety-washing. Based on a review of benchmarking practices, we propose criteria to decide when to fully or partially deprecate benchmarks, and a framework for deprecating benchmarks. Our work aims to advance the state of benchmarking towards rigorous and quality evaluations, especially for frontier models, and our recommendations are aimed to benefit benchmark developers, benchmark users, AI governance actors (across governments, academia, and industry panels), and policy makers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.
Builds on
27 of 47 references.
References · 27
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
- 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 333
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
- 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2024Are We Done with MMLU?cited by 194
- 2024Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 147
- 2021The Benchmark Lotterycited by 136
15 more
- 2024BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practicescited by 114
- 2024Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2018Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: a surveycited by 92
- 2022Mapping global dynamics of benchmark creation and saturation in artificial intelligencecited by 71
- 2024Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligencecited by 68
- 2025The Leaderboard Illusioncited by 66
- 2024Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?cited by 61
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 60
- 2023Benchmarks for Automated Commonsense Reasoning: A Surveycited by 40
- 2024Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AIcited by 35
- 2025AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommonscited by 35
- 2021A Framework for Deprecating Datasets: Standardizing Documentation, Identification, and Communicationcited by 18
- 2022Benchmark datasets driving artificial intelligence development fail to capture the needs of medical professionalscited by 16
- 2025Audit Cards: Contextualizing AI Evaluationscited by 10
- 2024Benchmark Early and Red Team Often: A Framework for Assessing and Managing Dual-Use Hazards of AI Foundation Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.