KPFlow: An Operator Perspective on Dynamic Collapse Under Gradient Descent Training of Recurrent Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient Descent (GD) and its variants are the primary tool for enabling efficient training of recurrent dynamical systems such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Neural ODEs and Gated Recurrent units (GRUs). The dynamics that are formed in these models exhibit features such as neural collapse and emergence of latent representations that may support the remarkable generalization properties of networks. In neuroscience, qualitative features of these representations are used to compare learning in biological and artificial systems. Despite recent progress, there remains a need for theoretical tools to rigorously understand the mechanisms shaping learned representations, especially in finite, non-linear models. Here, we show that the gradient flow, which describes how the model's dynamics evolve over GD, can be decomposed into a product that involves two operators: a Parameter Operator, K, and a Linearized Flow Propagator, P. K mirrors the Neural Tangent Kernel in feed-forward neural networks, while P appears in Lyapunov stability and optimal control theory. We demonstrate two applications of our decomposition. First, we show how their interplay gives rise to low-dimensional latent dynamics under GD, and, specifically, how the collapse is a result of the network structure, over and above the nature of the underlying task. Second, for multi-task training, we show that the operators can be used to measure how objectives relevant to individual sub-tasks align. We experimentally and theoretically validate these findings, providing an efficient Pytorch package, KPFlow, implementing robust analysis tools for general recurrent architectures. Taken together, our work moves towards building a next stage of understanding of GD learning in non-linear recurrent models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.
Builds on
21 of 55 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
- 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
- 2017Maximum Principle Based Algorithms for Deep Learningcited by 77
- 2020The Recurrent Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 67
- 2021On the difficulty of learning chaotic dynamics with RNNscited by 64
- 2020Lyapunov spectra of chaotic recurrent neural networkscited by 37
- 2020Discretize-Optimize vs. Optimize-Discretize for Time-Series Regression and Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 36
9 more
- 2024Out-of-Domain Generalization in Dynamical Systems Reconstructioncited by 33
- 2020On Lyapunov Exponents for RNNs: Understanding Information Propagation Using Dynamical Systems Toolscited by 31
- 2020The interplay between randomness and structure during learning in RNNscited by 20
- 2023How connectivity structure shapes rich and lazy learning in neural circuitscited by 15
- 2023Finite-time Lyapunov exponents of deep neural networkscited by 12
- 2015Transition to chaos in random neuronal networkscited by 11
- 2025Dynamics of learning to integrate in linear recurrent neural networkscited by 4
- 2023Evolutionary algorithms as an alternative to backpropagation for supervised training of Biophysical Neural Networks and Neural ODEscited by 3
- 2020Exploring Flip Flop memories and beyond: training recurrent neural networks with key insightscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.