mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Geo-Registration of Terrestrial LiDAR Point Clouds with Satellite Images without GNSS

arXiv 2507.05999 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate geo-registration of LiDAR point clouds remains a significant challenge in urban environments where Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals are denied or degraded. Existing methods typically rely on real-time GNSS and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data, which require pre-calibration and assume stable signals. However, this assumption often fails in dense cities, resulting in localization errors. To address this, we propose a structured post-hoc geo-registration method that accurately aligns LiDAR point clouds with satellite images. The proposed approach targets point cloud datasets where reliable GNSS information is unavailable or degraded, enabling city-scale geo-registration as a post-processing solution. Our method uses a pre-trained Point Transformer to segment road points, then extracts road skeletons and intersections from the point cloud and the satellite image. Global alignment is achieved through rigid transformation using corresponding intersection points, followed by local non-rigid refinement with radial basis function (RBF) interpolation. Elevation discrepancies are corrected using terrain data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). To evaluate geo-registration accuracy, we measure the absolute distances between the roads extracted from the two modalities. Our method is validated on the KITTI benchmark and a newly collected dataset of Perth, Western Australia. On KITTI, our method achieves a mean planimetric alignment error of 0.69m, corresponding to a 50% reduction in global geo-registration bias compared to the raw KITTI annotations. On Perth dataset, it achieves a mean planimetric error of 2.17m from GNSS values extracted from Google Maps, corresponding to 57.4% improvement over rigid alignment. Elevation correlation factor improved by 30.5% (KITTI) and 55.8% (Perth).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

9 of 65 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  2. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
  3. 2023Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Strongercited by 589
  4. 2022Point Transformer V2: Grouped Vector Attention and Partition-based Poolingcited by 388
  5. 2020Towards Semantic Segmentation of Urban-Scale 3D Point Clouds: A Dataset, Benchmarks and Challengescited by 80
  6. 2021F-LOAM: Fast LiDAR Odometry And Mappingcited by 45
  7. 2021NDT-Transformer: Large-Scale 3D Point Cloud Localisation using the Normal Distribution Transform Representationcited by 38
  8. 2023Survey on LiDAR Perception in Adverse Weather Conditionscited by 24
  9. 2019UrbanLoco: A Full Sensor Suite Dataset for Mapping and Localization in Urban Scenescited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.