mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Red Teaming AI Red Teaming

arXiv 2507.05538 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2025cs.AI cs.CR cs.CYcited by 3

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

Red teaming has evolved from its origins in military applications to become a widely adopted methodology in cybersecurity and AI. In this paper, we take a critical look at the practice of AI red teaming. We argue that despite its current popularity in AI governance, there exists a significant gap between red teaming's original intent as a critical thinking exercise and its narrow focus on discovering model-level flaws in the context of generative AI. Current AI red teaming efforts focus predominantly on individual model vulnerabilities while overlooking the broader sociotechnical systems and emergent behaviors that arise from complex interactions between models, users, and environments. To address this deficiency, we propose a comprehensive framework operationalizing red teaming in AI systems at two levels: macro-level system red teaming spanning the entire AI development lifecycle, and micro-level model red teaming. Drawing on cybersecurity experience and systems theory, we further propose a set of six recommendations. In these, we emphasize that effective AI red teaming requires multifunctional teams that examine emergent risks, systemic vulnerabilities, and the interplay between technical and social factors.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 10 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.

Builds on

10 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Red Teaming Contemporary AI Models: Insights from Spanish and Basque Perspectives13 Mar
  2. 2025OpenAI's Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems24 Jan
  3. 2025Lessons From Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Products13 Jan
  4. 2024Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI23 Sep
  5. 2024Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?29 Jan
  6. 2023Summon a Demon and Bind it: A Grounded Theory of LLM Red Teaming10 Nov

Other references · 4

  1. 2025Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effectscited by 19
  2. 2025In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AIcited by 7
  3. 2023The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming Offers a Balanced Path Forwardcited by 1
  4. 2025I'm Sorry Dave: How the old world of personnel security can inform the new world of AI insider riskcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From Firewalls to Frontiers: AI Red-Teaming is a Domain-Specific Evolution of Cyber Red-Teaming
  2. 2026A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Red Teaming Methodologies for Assurance and Security of AI Applications
  3. 2024AI red-teaming is a sociotechnical problem: on values, labor, and harms
  4. 2026Red Teaming LLMs as Socio-Technical Practice: From Exploration and Data Creation to Evaluation
  5. 2025Organization Matters: A Qualitative Study of Organizational Dynamics in Red Teaming Practices for Generative AI
  6. 2024The Human Factor in AI Red Teaming: Perspectives from Social and Collaborative Computing
  7. 2026Governing Execution Risk in Agentic AI Systems: A Trajectory-Guided Framework for Red Teaming
  8. 2025Mind the Gap: Comparing Model- vs Agentic-Level Red Teaming with Action-Graph Observability on GPT-OSS-20B