Leveraging Self-Supervised Features for Efficient Flooded Region Identification in UAV Aerial Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying regions affected by disasters is a vital step in effectively managing and planning relief and rescue efforts. Unlike the traditional approaches of manually assessing post-disaster damage, analyzing images of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) offers an objective and reliable way to assess the damage. In the past, segmentation techniques have been adopted to identify post-flood damage in UAV aerial images. However, most of these supervised learning approaches rely on manually annotated datasets. Indeed, annotating images is a time-consuming and error-prone task that requires domain expertise. This work focuses on leveraging self-supervised features to accurately identify flooded regions in UAV aerial images. This work proposes two encoder-decoder-based segmentation approaches, which integrate the visual features learned from DINOv2 with the traditional encoder backbone. This study investigates the generalization of self-supervised features for UAV aerial images. Specifically, we evaluate the effectiveness of features from the DINOv2 model, trained on non-aerial images, for segmenting aerial images, noting the distinct perspectives between the two image types. Our results demonstrate that DINOv2's self-supervised pretraining on natural images generates transferable, general-purpose visual features that streamline the development of aerial segmentation workflows. By leveraging these features as a foundation, we significantly reduce reliance on labor-intensive manual annotation processes, enabling high-accuracy segmentation with limited labeled aerial data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
21 of 46 references.
References · 21
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,487
- 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
- 2021Segmenter: Transformer for Semantic Segmentationcited by 855
- 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 657
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
9 more
- 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 314
- 2016ENet: A Deep Neural Network Architecture for Real-Time Semantic Segmentationcited by 291
- 2020FloodNet: A High Resolution Aerial Imagery Dataset for Post Flood Scene Understandingcited by 181
- 2021UNetFormer: A UNet-like Transformer for Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Urban Scene Imagerycited by 167
- 2023Know Your Self-supervised Learning: A Survey on Image-based Generative and Discriminative Trainingcited by 39
- 2016Classification With an Edge: Improving Semantic Image Segmentation with Boundary Detectioncited by 38
- 2020MSNet: A Multilevel Instance Segmentation Network for Natural Disaster Damage Assessment in Aerial Videoscited by 25
- 2022Fully Self-Supervised Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 11
- 2018From Satellite Imagery to Disaster Insightscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.