mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Localising Dropout Variance in Twin Networks

arXiv 2507.03622 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate individual treatment-effect estimation demands not only reliable point predictions but also uncertainty measures that help practitioners locate the source of model failure. We introduce a layer-wise variance decomposition for deep twin-network models: by toggling Monte Carlo Dropout independently in the shared encoder and the outcome heads, we split total predictive variance into an encoder component (σenc2) and a head component (σhead2), with σenc2 + σhead2 ≈ σtot2 by the law of total variance. Across three synthetic covariate-shift regimes, the encoder component dominates under distributional shift (ρenc=0.53) while the head component becomes informative only once encoder uncertainty is controlled. On a real-world twins cohort with induced multivariate shift, only σenc2 spikes on out-of-distribution samples and becomes the primary error predictor (ρenc!≈!0.89), while σhead2 remains flat. The decomposition adds negligible cost over standard MC Dropout and provides a practical diagnostic for deciding whether to collect more diverse covariates or more outcome data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2025.

Builds on

10 of 14 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
  5. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  6. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  7. 2024Estimating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty with a Single Modelcited by 54
  8. 2024Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 42
  9. 2025From Aleatoric to Epistemic: Exploring Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Artificial Intelligencecited by 18
  10. 2022A Survey of Deep Causal Models and Their Industrial Applicationscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.