mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Blackbox Dataset Inference for LLM

arXiv 2507.03619 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2025cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Today, the training of large language models (LLMs) can involve personally identifiable information and copyrighted material, incurring dataset misuse. To mitigate the problem of dataset misuse, this paper explores textitdataset inference, which aims to detect if a suspect model M used a victim dataset D in training. Previous research tackles dataset inference by aggregating results of membership inference attacks (MIAs) -- methods to determine whether individual samples are a part of the training dataset. However, restricted by the low accuracy of MIAs, previous research mandates grey-box access to M to get intermediate outputs (probabilities, loss, perplexity, etc.) for obtaining satisfactory results. This leads to reduced practicality, as LLMs, especially those deployed for profits, have limited incentives to return the intermediate outputs. In this paper, we propose a new method of dataset inference with only black-box access to the target model (i.e., assuming only the text-based responses of the target model are available). Our method is enabled by two sets of locally built reference models, one set involving D in training and the other not. By measuring which set of reference model M is closer to, we determine if M used D for training. Evaluations of real-world LLMs in the wild show that our method offers high accuracy in all settings and presents robustness against bypassing attempts.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?
  2. 2026Detecting Data Contamination in Large Language Models
  3. 2024Scaling Up Membership Inference: When and How Attacks Succeed on Large Language Models
  4. 2026Membership Inference on LLMs in the Wild
  5. 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?
  6. 2026Detecting Non-Membership in LLM Training Data via Rank Correlations
  7. 2024Self-Comparison for Dataset-Level Membership Inference in Large (Vision-)Language Models
  8. 2024Nob-MIAs: Non-biased Membership Inference Attacks Assessment on Large Language Models with Ex-Post Dataset Construction