Structure-Aware Compound-Protein Affinity Prediction via Graph Neural Networks with Group Lasso Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable artificial intelligence approaches accelerate drug discovery by improving molecular representation learning, identifying key molecular structures, and rationalizing drug property prediction. However, developing end-to-end explainable models for target-specific structure-activity relationship modeling remains challenging because compound-protein interaction data are often limited for individual targets, and small changes in chemical substituents or local structural motifs can cause large differences in molecular properties. Therefore, effectively leveraging structural and property information to identify key moieties associated with compound-protein affinity is essential. We propose a graph neural network (GNN) framework that uses property and structural information from activity-cliff molecule pairs targeting specific proteins to predict compound-protein affinity, measured by half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), and explain property differences. To improve explainability, we trained GNNs with structure-aware loss functions using group lasso and sparse group lasso regularization, which prune and highlight molecular subgraphs relevant to activity differences. We applied this framework to activity-cliff data from molecules targeting six tyrosine-protein kinases across the Src, Abl, and Tec families, as well as anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Integrating common- and uncommon-node information with sparse group lasso improved target-specific molecular property prediction, producing lower root mean square errors and higher Pearson correlation coefficients. Regularization also enhanced GNN feature attribution by improving graph-level global direction scores and atom-level coloring accuracy. These results support more interpretable drug discovery pipelines, particularly for identifying critical molecular substructures during lead optimization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2025.
Builds on
19 of 69 references.
References · 19
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 964
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 735
- 2020Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Networkcited by 423
- 2017Dynamic Edge-Conditioned Filters in Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphscited by 307
7 more
- 2021DIG: A Turnkey Library for Diving into Graph Deep Learning Researchcited by 76
- 2018Using Attribution to Decode Dataset Bias in Neural Network Models for Chemistrycited by 25
- 2022Scheduling Techniques for Liver Segmentation: ReduceLRonPlateau Vs OneCycleLRcited by 19
- 2021Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable Graph Neural Networks for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 15
- 2023Deep Learning Methods for Small Molecule Drug Discovery: A Surveycited by 10
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery and Development -- A Comprehensive Surveycited by 4
- 2025Representational Alignment with Chemical Induced Fit for Molecular Relational Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.