mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adopting a human developmental visual diet yields robust, shape-based AI vision

arXiv 2507.03168 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite years of research and the dramatic scaling of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, a striking misalignment between artificial and human vision persists. Contrary to humans, AI relies heavily on texture-features rather than shape information, lacks robustness to image distortions, remains highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, and struggles to recognise simple abstract shapes within complex backgrounds. To close this gap, here we take inspiration from how human vision develops from early infancy into adulthood. We quantified visual maturation by synthesising decades of research into a novel developmental visual diet (DVD) for AI vision. Guiding AI systems through this human-inspired curriculum, which considers the development of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and colour, produces models that better align with human behaviour on every hallmark of robust vision tested, yielding the strongest reported reliance on shape information to date, abstract shape recognition beyond the state of the art, and higher resilience to image corruptions and adversarial attacks. Our results thus demonstrate that robust AI vision can be achieved by guiding how a model learns, not merely how much it learns, offering a resource-efficient route toward safer and more human-like artificial visual systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2025.

Builds on

25 of 85 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  11. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  12. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
13 more
  1. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  2. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
  3. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 215
  4. 2024Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification?cited by 102
  5. 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
  6. 2023Neither hype nor gloom do DNNs justicecited by 40
  7. 2024Can We Talk Models Into Seeing the World Differently?cited by 23
  8. 2023Learning high-level visual representations from a child's perspective without strong inductive biasescited by 22
  9. 2021The Emergence of the Shape Bias Results from Communicative Efficiencycited by 13
  10. 2023Are Deep Neural Networks Adequate Behavioural Models of Human Visual Perception?cited by 10
  11. 2022The developmental trajectory of object recognition robustness: children are like small adults but unlike big deep neural networkscited by 9
  12. 2024MindSet: Vision. A toolbox for testing DNNs on key psychological experimentscited by 8
  13. 2023Characterising representation dynamics in recurrent neural networks for object recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.