mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Measurement to Mitigation: Exploring the Transferability of Debiasing Approaches to Gender Bias in Maltese Language Models

arXiv 2507.03142 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed Natural Language Processing (NLP), enabling performance across diverse tasks with little task-specific training. However, LLMs remain susceptible to social biases, particularly reflecting harmful stereotypes from training data, which can disproportionately affect marginalised communities. We measure gender bias in Maltese LMs, arguing that such bias is harmful as it reinforces societal stereotypes and fails to account for gender diversity, which is especially problematic in gendered, low-resource languages. While bias evaluation and mitigation efforts have progressed for English-centric models, research on low-resourced and morphologically rich languages remains limited. This research investigates the transferability of debiasing methods to Maltese language models, focusing on BERTu and mBERTu, BERT-based monolingual and multilingual models respectively. Bias measurement and mitigation techniques from English are adapted to Maltese, using benchmarks such as CrowS-Pairs and SEAT, alongside debiasing methods Counterfactual Data Augmentation, Dropout Regularization, Auto-Debias, and GuiDebias. We also contribute to future work in the study of gender bias in Maltese by creating evaluation datasets. Our findings highlight the challenges of applying existing bias mitigation methods to linguistically complex languages, underscoring the need for more inclusive approaches in the development of multilingual NLP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2025.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  5. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  6. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  9. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
  10. 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 224
  11. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
  12. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
5 more
  1. 2020Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Biascited by 82
  2. 2017Racial Disparity in Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Social Media African-American Englishcited by 71
  3. 2023Using In-Context Learning to Improve Dialogue Safetycited by 42
  4. 2020Evaluating Bias In Dutch Word Embeddingscited by 15
  5. 2022Pre-training Data Quality and Quantity for a Low-Resource Language: New Corpus and BERT Models for Maltesecited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.