CLUES: Collaborative High-Quality Data Selection for LLMs via Training Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research has highlighted the importance of data quality in scaling large language models (LLMs). However, automated data quality control faces unique challenges in collaborative settings where sharing is not allowed directly between data silos. To tackle this issue, this paper proposes a novel data quality control technique based on the notion of data influence on the training dynamics of LLMs, that high quality data are more likely to have similar training dynamics to the anchor dataset. We then leverage the influence of the training dynamics to select high-quality data from different private domains, with centralized model updates on the server side in a collaborative training fashion by either model merging or federated learning. As for the data quality indicator, we compute the per-sample gradients with respect to the private data and the anchor dataset, and use the trace of the accumulated inner products as a measurement of data quality. In addition, we develop a quality control evaluation tailored for collaborative settings with heterogeneous domain data. Experiments show that training on the high-quality data selected by our method can often outperform other data selection methods for collaborative fine-tuning of LLMs, across diverse private domain datasets, in medical, multilingual and financial settings. Our code is released at github.com/Ryan0v0/CLUES.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.
Builds on
29 of 37 references.
References · 29
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
17 more
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 543
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 387
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2023MedAlpaca -- An Open-Source Collection of Medical Conversational AI Models and Training Datacited by 286
- 2023FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Modelscited by 253
- 2024Arcee's MergeKit: A Toolkit for Merging Large Language Modelscited by 194
- 2022Branch-Train-Merge: Embarrassingly Parallel Training of Expert Language Modelscited by 191
- 2021Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalizationcited by 144
- 2017Convergence Analysis of Two-layer Neural Networks with ReLU Activationcited by 137
- 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
- 2020Stochastic Weight Averaging in Parallel: Large-Batch Training that Generalizes Wellcited by 57
- 2022ColD Fusion: Collaborative Descent for Distributed Multitask Finetuningcited by 52
- 2019Luck Matters: Understanding Training Dynamics of Deep ReLU Networkscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline Methodscited by 3
- 2026Learning to Solve Complex Problems via Dataset Decompositioncited by 0
- 2026Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning30 Sep 2026
- 2026Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline Methods19 Apr 2026
- 2026Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning12 Mar 2026
- 2026Learning to Solve Complex Problems via Dataset Decomposition23 Feb 2026