AICO: Feature Significance Tests for Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning is central to modern science, industry, and policy, yet its predictive power often comes at the cost of transparency: we rarely know which input features truly drive a model's predictions. Without such understanding, researchers cannot draw reliable conclusions, practitioners cannot ensure fairness or accountability, and policymakers cannot trust or govern model-based decisions. Existing tools for assessing feature influence are limited; most lack statistical guarantees, and many require costly retraining or surrogate modeling, making them impractical for large modern models. We introduce AICO, a broadly applicable framework that turns model interpretability into an efficient statistical exercise. AICO tests whether each feature genuinely improves predictive performance by masking its information and measuring the resulting change. The method provides exact, finite-sample feature p-values and confidence intervals for feature importance through a simple, non-asymptotic hypothesis testing procedure. It requires no retraining, surrogate modeling, or distributional assumptions, making it feasible for large-scale algorithms. In both controlled experiments and real applications, from credit scoring to mortgage-behavior prediction, AICO reliably identifies the variables that drive model behavior, providing a scalable and statistically principled path toward transparent and trustworthy machine learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2025.
Builds on
33 of 84 references.
References · 33
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
- 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
- 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
- 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
- 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 121
- 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 87
- 2023Simple Hardware-Efficient Long Convolutions for Sequence Modelingcited by 62
21 more
- 2020A general framework for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importancecited by 45
- 2018Deep Knockoffscited by 41
- 2019Conditional Independence Testing using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 36
- 2019Testing Conditional Independence in Supervised Learning Algorithmscited by 27
- 2023Feature Importance: A Closer Look at Shapley Values and LOCOcited by 23
- 2020Fast and Powerful Conditional Randomization Testing via Distillationcited by 19
- 2022The Missing Indicator Method: From Low to High Dimensionscited by 19
- 2022The Projected Covariance Measure for assumption-lean variable significance testingcited by 16
- 2021Decorrelated Variable Importancecited by 13
- 2022BASED-XAI: Breaking Ablation Studies Down for Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 13
- 2019Metropolized Knockoff Samplingcited by 10
- 2019Scalable and Efficient Hypothesis Testing with Random Forestscited by 8
- 2022LOCO Feature Importance Inference without Data Splitting via Minipatch Ensemblescited by 6
- 2023Rank-transformed subsampling: inference for multiple data splitting and exchangeable p-valuescited by 5
- 2022Model free variable importance for high dimensional datacited by 3
- 2024Assessing treatment effects in observational data with missing confounders: A comparative study of practical doubly-robust and traditional missing data methodscited by 2
- 2014Multiple Test Functions and Adjusted p-Values for Test Statistics with Discrete Distributionscited by 1
- 2020Improved q-values for discrete uniform and homogeneous tests: a comparative studycited by 1
- 2022Flexible variable selection in the presence of missing datacited by 1
- 2023Inference on summaries of a model-agnostic longitudinal variable importance trajectory with application to suicide preventioncited by 1
- 2025A Set-Sequence Model for Time Seriescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.