mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Learning Adapter Rank via Symmetry Breaking

arXiv 2506.22809 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Low-rank adaptation is effective partly because downstream updates lie in a low-dimensional subspace, but the latent rank coordinates of LoRA are not identifiable: any invertible reparameterization of the adapter factors leaves the weight update unchanged. We show that variational inference with a diagonal rank-wise posterior turns this non-identifiability into a useful inductive bias. By breaking LoRA's rotational gauge symmetry, the variational objective selects a preferred basis in rank space, enabling automatic relevance determination over rank directions. This yields Low-Rank Variational Dropout (LRVD), a Bayesian framework that performs inference directly in the low-rank adaptation space rather than the ambient weight space. As an instantiation, BayesLoRA jointly learns effective adapter rank and predictive uncertainty with only O(r) additional parameters. Empirically, BayesLoRA induces stable rank structure aligned with the dominant singular directions of learned updates, yields compact predictive calibration and matches or exceeds strong low-rank sparsification baselines at comparable training cost.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2025.

Builds on

22 of 24 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,880
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,340
  5. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,823
  6. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 960
  7. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 665
  8. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 557
  9. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  10. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
  11. 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
  12. 2017Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 157
10 more
  1. 2017Bayesian Compression for Deep Learningcited by 116
  2. 2023Bayesian Low-rank Adaptation for Large Language Modelscited by 114
  3. 2024Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't Knowcited by 99
  4. 2023LoRA ensembles for large language model fine-tuningcited by 67
  5. 2024BLoB: Bayesian Low-Rank Adaptation by Backpropagation for Large Language Modelscited by 50
  6. 2017Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative Noisecited by 39
  7. 2024Uncertainty quantification in fine-tuned LLMs using LoRA ensemblescited by 37
  8. 2024Gaussian Stochastic Weight Averaging for Bayesian Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 20
  9. 2024LoRA-Ensemble: Efficient Uncertainty Modelling for Self-Attention Networkscited by 20
  10. 2025Minimal Ranks, Maximum Confidence: Parameter-efficient Uncertainty Quantification for LoRAcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.