OptScale: Probabilistic Optimality for Inference-time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Inference-time scaling has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing approaches often rely on heuristic strategies for parallel sampling, lacking a principled foundation. To address this gap, we propose a probabilistic framework that formalizes the optimality of inference-time scaling under the assumption that parallel samples are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.), and where the Best-of-N selection strategy follows a probability distribution that can be estimated. Within this framework, we derive a theoretical lower bound on the required number of samples to achieve a target performance level, providing the first principled guidance for compute-efficient scaling. Leveraging this insight, we develop textscOptScale, a practical algorithm that dynamically determines the optimal number of sampled responses. textscOptScale employs a language model-based predictor to estimate probabilistic prior parameters, enabling the decision of the minimal number of samples needed that satisfy predefined performance thresholds and confidence levels. Extensive experiments on representative reasoning benchmarks (including MATH-500, GSM8K, AIME, and AMC) demonstrate that textscOptScale significantly reduces sampling overhead while remaining better or on par with state-of-the-art reasoning performance. Our work offers both a theoretical foundation and a practical solution for principled inference-time scaling, addressing a critical gap in the efficient deployment of LLMs for complex reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2025.
Builds on
23 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2025SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free7 Apr
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?31 Mar
- 2025Think Twice: Enhancing LLM Reasoning by Scaling Multi-round Test-time Thinking25 Mar
- 2025Towards Thinking-Optimal Scaling of Test-Time Compute for LLM Reasoning25 Feb
- 2025Dynamic Parallel Tree Search for Efficient LLM Reasoning22 Feb
- 2024Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification5 Oct
- 2024Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling30 Aug
- 2024Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning24 Aug
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning19 Jan
- 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs19 May
- 2023Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thought15 May
Other references · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 293
- 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 284
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
- 2025Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 123
- 2025A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systemscited by 111
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix Itcited by 1
- 2026MarkovScale: Towards Optimal Sequential Scaling at Inference Timecited by 0
- 2026HyPER: Bridging Exploration and Exploitation for Scalable LLM Reasoning with Hypothesis Path Expansion and Reductioncited by 0
- 2026More Correct Mass, Worse Answers: Why Power Sampling Can Fail and How to Fix It14 Aug 2026
- 2026HyPER: Bridging Exploration and Exploitation for Scalable LLM Reasoning with Hypothesis Path Expansion and Reduction6 Feb 2026
- 2026MarkovScale: Towards Optimal Sequential Scaling at Inference Time1 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling
- 2025DynScaling: Efficient Verifier-free Inference Scaling via Dynamic and Integrated Sampling
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2025Parallel Scaling Law for Language Models
- 2025When Life Gives You Samples: The Benefits of Scaling up Inference Compute for Multilingual LLMs
- 2025Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling: Efficiency Limits and Linguistic Signals
- 2026Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning LLMs: Inference Regimes, Evaluation, and Reproducibility