Optimal Estimation of Watermark Proportions in Hybrid AI-Human Texts
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
Text watermarks in large language models (LLMs) are an increasingly important tool for detecting synthetic text and distinguishing human-written content from LLM-generated text. While most existing studies focus on determining whether entire texts are watermarked, many real-world scenarios involve mixed-source texts, which blend human-written and watermarked content. In this paper, we address the problem of optimally estimating the watermark proportion in mixed-source texts. We cast this problem as estimating the proportion parameter in a mixture model based on pivotal statistics. First, we show that this parameter is not even identifiable in certain watermarking schemes, let alone consistently estimable. In stark contrast, for watermarking methods that employ continuous pivotal statistics for detection, we demonstrate that the proportion parameter is identifiable under mild conditions. We propose efficient estimators for this class of methods, which include several popular unbiased watermarks as examples, and derive minimax lower bounds for any measurable estimator based on pivotal statistics, showing that our estimators achieve these lower bounds. Through evaluations on both synthetic data and mixed-source text generated by open-source models, we demonstrate that our proposed estimators consistently achieve high estimation accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025On the Empirical Power of Goodness-of-Fit Tests in Watermark Detectioncited by 5
- 2026Sample Complexities of Estimating Gumbel--Max Watermark Proportions with and without Reduction to Pivotal Statisticscited by 1
- 2026Watermark Forensics for Generative Models: An Information-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Optimal Watermark Localization in Mixed-Source Large Language Model Textscited by 1
- 2026textGrain watermarking is harder to detect: can sum-tests still do it optimally?cited by 0
- 2026textGrain watermarking is harder to detect: can sum-tests still do it optimally?13 Oct 2026
- 2026Optimal Watermark Localization in Mixed-Source Large Language Model Texts14 Aug 2026
- 2026Watermark Forensics for Generative Models: An Information-Theoretic Perspective14 Jul 2026
- 2026Sample Complexities of Estimating Gumbel--Max Watermark Proportions with and without Reduction to Pivotal Statistics30 Jun 2026
- 2025On the Empirical Power of Goodness-of-Fit Tests in Watermark Detection4 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rules
- 2025Optimal Detection for Language Watermarks with Pseudorandom Collision
- 2025Optimized Couplings for Watermarking Large Language Models
- 2025DERMARK: A Dynamic, Efficient and Robust Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Models
- 2024Efficiently Identifying Watermarked Segments in Mixed-Source Texts
- 2024Theoretically Grounded Framework for LLM Watermarking: A Distribution-Adaptive Approach
- 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Models
- 2024Robust Detection of Watermarks for Large Language Models Under Human Edits