Boosting Classification with Quantum-Inspired Augmentations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the impact of small quantum gate perturbations, which are common in quantum digital devices but absent in classical computers, is crucial for identifying potential advantages in quantum machine learning. While these perturbations are typically seen as detrimental to quantum computation, they can actually enhance performance by serving as a natural source of data augmentation. Additionally, they can often be efficiently simulated on classical hardware, enabling quantum-inspired approaches to improve classical machine learning methods. In this paper, we investigate random Bloch sphere rotations, which are fundamental SU(2) transformations, as a simple yet effective quantum-inspired data augmentation technique. Unlike conventional augmentations such as flipping, rotating, or cropping, quantum transformations lack intuitive spatial interpretations, making their application to tasks like image classification less straightforward. While common quantum augmentation methods rely on applying quantum models or trainable quanvolutional layers to classical datasets, we focus on the direct application of small-angle Bloch rotations and their effect on classical data. Using the large-scale ImageNet dataset, we demonstrate that our quantum-inspired augmentation method improves image classification performance, increasing Top-1 accuracy by 3%, Top-5 accuracy by 2.5%, and the F1 score from 8% to 12% compared to standard classical augmentation methods. Finally, we examine the use of stronger unitary augmentations. Although these transformations preserve information in principle, they result in visually unrecognizable images with potential applications for privacy computations. However, we show that our augmentation approach and simple SU(2) transformations do not enhance differential privacy and discuss the implications of this limitation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2025.
Builds on
16 of 54 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2019Transfer learning in hybrid classical-quantum neural networkscited by 114
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learningcited by 97
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 85
- 2021Quantum Self-Supervised Learningcited by 20
- 2019Quantum-inspired algorithms in practicecited by 18
- 2018Quantum-inspired sublinear classical algorithms for solving low-rank linear systemscited by 12
- 2023Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning: a Surveycited by 12
4 more
- 2024KetGPT - Dataset Augmentation of Quantum Circuits using Transformerscited by 8
- 2023New Benchmarks for Asian Facial Recognition Tasks: Face Classification with Large Foundation Modelscited by 4
- 2025Quantum-inspired Embeddings Projection and Similarity Metrics for Representation Learningcited by 4
- 2024Benefiting from Quantum? A Comparative Study of Q-Seg, Quantum-Inspired Techniques, and U-Net for Crack Segmentationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.