Quantum-inspired sublinear classical algorithms for solving low-rank linear systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present classical sublinear-time algorithms for solving low-rank linear systems of equations. Our algorithms are inspired by the HHL quantum algorithm for solving linear systems and the recent breakthrough by Tang of dequantizing the quantum algorithm for recommendation systems. Let A ∈ mathbbCm × n be a rank-k matrix, and b ∈ mathbbCm be a vector. We present two algorithms: a "sampling" algorithm that provides a sample from A-1b and a "query" algorithm that outputs an estimate of an entry of A-1b, where A-1 denotes the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse. Both of our algorithms have query and time complexity O(poly(k, kappa, |A|F, 1/ε),polylog(m, n)), where kappa is the condition number of A and ε is the precision parameter. Note that the algorithms we consider are sublinear time, so they cannot write and read the whole matrix or vectors. In this paper, we assume that A and b come with well-known low-overhead data structures such that entries of A and b can be sampled according to some natural probability distributions. Alternatively, when A is positive semidefinite, our algorithms can be adapted so that the sampling assumption on b is not required.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 31
- 2023Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning: a Surveycited by 11
- 2021Quantum Machine Learning for Financecited by 7
- 2022Low-Rank Approximation with 1/ε1/3 Matrix-Vector Productscited by 7
- 2022Differential Privacy Amplification in Quantum and Quantum-inspired Algorithmscited by 6
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithmscited by 5
- 2021Quantum Machine Learning For Classical Datacited by 2
- 2023Krylov Methods are (nearly) Optimal for Low-Rank Approximationcited by 2
- 2025Boosting Classification with Quantum-Inspired Augmentationscited by 0
- 2025Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Diagonally Dominant Systems and Applications to the Friedkin-Johnsen Modelcited by 0
- 2026A Quantum-Inspired Dequantization Method for Diagonally Weighted Matrix Functions: Application to Learning with Optimized Random Featurescited by 0
- 2026A Quantum-Inspired Dequantization Method for Diagonally Weighted Matrix Functions: Application to Learning with Optimized Random Features9 Sep 2026
- 2025Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Diagonally Dominant Systems and Applications to the Friedkin-Johnsen Model16 Sep 2025
- 2025Boosting Classification with Quantum-Inspired Augmentations27 Jun 2025
- 2023Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning: a Survey22 Aug 2023
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithms10 Jul 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2023Krylov Methods are (nearly) Optimal for Low-Rank Approximation6 Apr 2023
- 2022Differential Privacy Amplification in Quantum and Quantum-inspired Algorithms7 Mar 2022
- 2022Low-Rank Approximation with 1/ε1/3 Matrix-Vector Products10 Feb 2022
- 2021Quantum Machine Learning for Finance9 Sep 2021
- 2021Quantum Machine Learning For Classical Data8 May 2021