mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Why Neural Network Can Discover Symbolic Structures with Gradient-based Training: An Algebraic and Geometric Foundation for Neurosymbolic Reasoning

arXiv 2506.21797 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a theoretical framework that explains how discrete symbolic structures can emerge naturally from continuous neural network training dynamics. By lifting neural parameters to a measure space and modeling training as Wasserstein gradient flow, we show that under geometric constraints, such as group invariance, the parameter measure μt undergoes two concurrent phenomena: (1) a decoupling of the gradient flow into independent optimization trajectories over some potential functions, and (2) a progressive contraction on the degree of freedom. These potentials encode algebraic constraints relevant to the task and act as ring homomorphisms under a commutative semi-ring structure on the measure space. As training progresses, the network transitions from a high-dimensional exploration to compositional representations that comply with algebraic operations and exhibit a lower degree of freedom. We further establish data scaling laws for realizing symbolic tasks, linking representational capacity to the group invariance that facilitates symbolic solutions. This framework charts a principled foundation for understanding and designing neurosymbolic systems that integrate continuous learning with discrete algebraic reasoning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022On the Paradox of Learning to Reason from Data23 May

Other references · 20

  1. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  2. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  3. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  4. 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 312
  5. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
  6. 2022The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformerscited by 193
  7. 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
  8. 2024The Illusion of State in State-Space Modelscited by 187
  9. 2021Primer: Searching for Efficient Transformers for Language Modelingcited by 164
  10. 2023Equivariant Architectures for Learning in Deep Weight Spacescited by 107
  11. 2018On the Power of Over-parametrization in Neural Networks with Quadratic Activationcited by 102
  12. 2023Grokking modular arithmeticcited by 83
8 more
  1. 2024ReLU2 Wins: Discovering Efficient Activation Functions for Sparse LLMscited by 67
  2. 2022Signal Processing for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 46
  3. 2022Low Dimensional Invariant Embeddings for Universal Geometric Learningcited by 38
  4. 2023The Exact Sample Complexity Gain from Invariances for Kernel Regressioncited by 28
  5. 2024Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wildcited by 9
  6. 2023Polynomial Width is Sufficient for Set Representation with High-dimensional Featurescited by 6
  7. 2024Composing Global Solutions to Reasoning Tasks via Algebraic Objects in Neural Netscited by 6
  8. 2025Rethinking Addressing in Language Models via Contexualized Equivariant Positional Encodingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks
  2. 2024Neuro-symbolic Learning Yielding Logical Constraints
  3. 2026Dense Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning in a Unified Geometry State
  4. 2026The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning
  5. 2025Advanced Weakly-Supervised Formula Exploration for Neuro-Symbolic Mathematical Reasoning
  6. 2026Agentic Neurosymbolic Collaboration for Mathematical Discovery: A Case Study in Combinatorial Design
  7. 2024Discovering Abstract Symbolic Relations by Learning Unitary Group Representations
  8. 2026Neurosymbolic Discovery of Algebraic Graph Constructions