mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating List Construction and Temporal Understanding capabilities of Large Language Models

arXiv 2506.21783 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense advances in a wide range of natural language tasks. However, these models are susceptible to hallucinations and errors on particularly temporal understanding tasks involving multiple entities in answers. In such tasks, they fail to associate entities with accurate time intervals, generate a complete list of entities in answers or reason about events associated with specific temporal bounds. Existing works do not extensively evaluate the abilities of the model to perform implicit and explicit temporal understanding in a list answer construction setup. To bridge this gap, we propose the Time referenced List based Question Answering or TLQA benchmark that requires structured answers in list format aligned with corresponding time periods. Our TLQA benchmark, requires both list construction and temporal understanding simultaneously, which to the best of our knowledge has not been explored in prior benchmarks. We investigate the temporal understanding and list construction capabilities of state-of-the-art generative models on TLQA in closed-book and open-domain settings. Our findings reveal significant shortcomings in current models, particularly their inability to provide complete answers and temporally align facts in a closed-book setup and the need to improve retrieval in open-domain setup, providing clear future directions for research on TLQA. The benchmark and code at https://github.com/elixir-research-group/TLQA.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

26 of 45 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  4. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  5. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
  6. 2021Time-Aware Language Models as Temporal Knowledge Basescited by 296
  7. 2024The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systemscited by 281
  8. 2021A Dataset for Answering Time-Sensitive Questionscited by 154
  9. 2021Simple Entity-Centric Questions Challenge Dense Retrieverscited by 140
  10. 2021Question Answering Over Temporal Knowledge Graphscited by 99
  11. 2024Can Large Language Models Reason and Plan?cited by 82
  12. 2021Complex Temporal Question Answering on Knowledge Graphscited by 69
14 more
  1. 2018EventKG: A Multilingual Event-Centric Temporal Knowledge Graphcited by 43
  2. 2021ArchivalQA: A Large-scale Benchmark Dataset for Open Domain Question Answering over Historical News Collectionscited by 30
  3. 2024Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMscited by 29
  4. 2021TempoQR: Temporal Question Reasoning over Knowledge Graphscited by 26
  5. 2022Improving Time Sensitivity for Question Answering over Temporal Knowledge Graphscited by 26
  6. 2024Analyzing Temporal Complex Events with Large Language Models? A Benchmark towards Temporal, Long Context Understandingcited by 23
  7. 2017Stochastic Answer Networks for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 22
  8. 2023Dynamic Benchmarking of Masked Language Models on Temporal Concept Drift with Multiple Viewscited by 21
  9. 2022RoMQA: A Benchmark for Robust, Multi-evidence, Multi-answer Question Answeringcited by 19
  10. 2021Sequence tagging for biomedical extractive question answeringcited by 12
  11. 2023Time-Aware Representation Learning for Time-Sensitive Question Answeringcited by 7
  12. 2023How Many Answers Should I Give? An Empirical Study of Multi-Answer Reading Comprehensioncited by 5
  13. 2024Toward Optimal Search and Retrieval for RAGcited by 4
  14. 2020TableQnA: Answering List Intent Queries With Web Tablescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.