mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Maximal Matching Matters: Preventing Representation Collapse for Robust Cross-Modal Retrieval

arXiv 2506.21538 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-modal image-text retrieval is challenging because of the diverse possible associations between content from different modalities. Traditional methods learn a single-vector embedding to represent semantics of each sample, but struggle to capture nuanced and diverse relationships that can exist across modalities. Set-based approaches, which represent each sample with multiple embeddings, offer a promising alternative, as they can capture richer and more diverse relationships. In this paper, we show that, despite their promise, these set-based representations continue to face issues including sparse supervision and set collapse, which limits their effectiveness. To address these challenges, we propose Maximal Pair Assignment Similarity to optimize one-to-one matching between embedding sets which preserve semantic diversity within the set. We also introduce two loss functions to further enhance the representations: Global Discriminative Loss to enhance distinction among embeddings, and Intra-Set Divergence Loss to prevent collapse within each set. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on MS-COCO and Flickr30k without relying on external data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

22 of 44 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  6. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  7. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
  8. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
  9. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  10. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
  11. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  12. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 151
10 more
  1. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 137
  2. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  3. 2021Thinking Fast and Slow: Efficient Text-to-Visual Retrieval with Transformerscited by 93
  4. 2017Look, Imagine and Match: Improving Textual-Visual Cross-Modal Retrieval with Generative Modelscited by 53
  5. 2023FACTUAL: A Benchmark for Faithful and Consistent Textual Scene Graph Parsingcited by 50
  6. 2020Fine-grained Visual Textual Alignment for Cross-Modal Retrieval using Transformer Encoderscited by 47
  7. 2020Universal Weighting Metric Learning for Cross-Modal Matchingcited by 34
  8. 2022Improving Cross-Modal Retrieval with Set of Diverse Embeddingscited by 33
  9. 2020Learning Dual Semantic Relations with Graph Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 30
  10. 20243SHNet: Boosting Image-Sentence Retrieval via Visual Semantic-Spatial Self-Highlightingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.