Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Perpetual voting addresses fairness in sequential collective decision-making by evaluating representational equity over time. However, existing perpetual voting rules rely on full participation and complete approval information, assumptions that rarely hold in practice, where partial turnout is the norm. In this work, we study the integration of Artificial Delegates, preference-learning agents trained to represent absent voters, into perpetual voting systems. We examine how absenteeism affects fairness and representativeness under various voting methods and evaluate the extent to which Artificial Delegates can compensate for missing participation. Our findings indicate that while absenteeism significantly affects fairness, Artificial Delegates reliably mitigate these effects and enhance robustness across diverse scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.
Builds on
4 of 23 references.
References · 4
- 2023Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 17
- 2022Representation with Incomplete Votescited by 13
- 2018The Fluid Mechanics of Liquid Democracycited by 10
- 2024Computing Voting Rules with Elicited Incomplete Votescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Social physics in the age of artificial intelligencecited by 5
- 2026Social physics in the age of artificial intelligence4 Mar 2026