Maintaining MTEB: Towards Long Term Usability and Reproducibility of Embedding Benchmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) has become a standard evaluation platform for text embedding models. While previous work has established the core benchmark methodology, this paper focuses on the engineering aspects that ensure MTEB's continued reproducibility and extensibility. We present our approach to maintaining robust continuous integration pipelines that validate dataset integrity, automate test execution, and assess benchmark results' generalizability. We detail the design choices that collectively enhance reproducibility and usability. Furthermore, we discuss our strategies for handling community contributions and extending the benchmark with new tasks and datasets. These engineering practices have been instrumental in scaling MTEB to become more comprehensive while maintaining quality and, ultimately, relevance to the field. Our experiences offer valuable insights for benchmark maintainers facing similar challenges in ensuring reproducibility and usability in machine learning evaluation frameworks. The MTEB repository is available at: https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.
Builds on
10 of 22 references.
References · 10
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
- 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
- 2024Encoder vs Decoder: Comparative Analysis of Encoder and Decoder Language Models on Multilingual NLU Taskscited by 33
- 2024The Scandinavian Embedding Benchmarks: Comprehensive Assessment of Multilingual and Monolingual Text Embeddingcited by 26
- 2024Recent advances in text embedding: A Comprehensive Review of Top-Performing Methods on the MTEB Benchmarkcited by 19
- 2024Writing Style Matters: An Examination of Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval Systemscited by 15
- 2024German Text Embedding Clustering Benchmarkcited by 13
- 2024ChemTEB: Chemical Text Embedding Benchmark, an Overview of Embedding Models Performance & Efficiency on a Specific Domaincited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Llama Nemoretriever Colembed: Top-Performing Text-Image Retrieval Modelcited by 24
- 2025Omni-Embed-Nemotron: A Unified Multimodal Retrieval Model for Text, Image, Audio, and Videocited by 10
- 2026Nemotron ColEmbed V2: Top-Performing Late Interaction Embedding Models for Visual Document Retrievalcited by 8
- 2026Unlocking Multimodal Document Intelligence: From Current Triumphs to Future Frontiers of Visual Document Retrievalcited by 8
- 2026Beyond Arrow: From Impossibility to Possibilities in Multi-Criteria Benchmarkingcited by 1
- 2026BTZSC: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot Text Classification Across Cross-Encoders, Embedding Models, Rerankers and LLMscited by 1
- 2026How Hard is it to Rig a Benchmark? A Social Choice Analysis of Leaderboard Robustnesscited by 0
- 2026How Hard is it to Rig a Benchmark? A Social Choice Analysis of Leaderboard Robustness22 May 2026
- 2026BTZSC: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot Text Classification Across Cross-Encoders, Embedding Models, Rerankers and LLMs12 Mar 2026
- 2026Unlocking Multimodal Document Intelligence: From Current Triumphs to Future Frontiers of Visual Document Retrieval23 Feb 2026
- 2026Beyond Arrow: From Impossibility to Possibilities in Multi-Criteria Benchmarking7 Feb 2026
- 2026Nemotron ColEmbed V2: Top-Performing Late Interaction Embedding Models for Visual Document Retrieval3 Feb 2026
- 2025Omni-Embed-Nemotron: A Unified Multimodal Retrieval Model for Text, Image, Audio, and Video3 Oct 2025
- 2025Llama Nemoretriever Colembed: Top-Performing Text-Image Retrieval Model7 Jul 2025