mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Response Quality Assessment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Conditional Conformal Factuality

arXiv 2506.20978 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.IRcited by 8

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing research on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) primarily focuses on improving overall question-answering accuracy, often overlooking the quality of sub-claims within generated responses. Recent methods that attempt to improve RAG trustworthiness, such as through auto-evaluation metrics, lack probabilistic guarantees or require ground truth answers. To address these limitations, we propose Conformal-RAG, a novel framework inspired by recent applications of conformal prediction (CP) on large language models (LLMs). Conformal-RAG leverages CP and internal information from the RAG mechanism to offer statistical guarantees on response quality. It ensures group-conditional coverage spanning multiple sub-domains without requiring manual labelling of conformal sets, making it suitable for complex RAG applications. Compared to existing RAG auto-evaluation methods, Conformal-RAG offers statistical guarantees on the quality of refined sub-claims, ensuring response reliability without the need for ground truth answers. Additionally, our experiments demonstrate that by leveraging information from the RAG system, Conformal-RAG retains up to 60% more high-quality sub-claims from the response compared to direct applications of CP to LLMs, while maintaining the same reliability guarantee.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey16 Sep
  2. 2024Synchronous Faithfulness Monitoring for Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generation19 Jun
  3. 2024C-RAG: Certified Generation Risks for Retrieval-Augmented Language Models5 Feb

Other references · 22

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  3. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  4. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
  5. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
  6. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
  7. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
  8. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  9. 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 596
  10. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  11. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
  12. 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 283
10 more
  1. 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 265
  2. 2023Conformal Language Modelingcited by 170
  3. 2024Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 146
  4. 2024Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methodscited by 92
  5. 2019Nested conformal prediction and quantile out-of-bag ensemble methodscited by 89
  6. 2024RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 61
  7. 2024Measuring and Enhancing Trustworthiness of LLMs in RAG through Grounded Attributions and Learning to Refusecited by 34
  8. 2024How well do LLMs cite relevant medical references? An evaluation framework and analysescited by 21
  9. 2024OLAPH: Improving Factuality in Biomedical Long-form Question Answeringcited by 20
  10. 2024Conformal Prediction Sets Can Cause Disparate Impactcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Dependable Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Factual Confidence Prediction
  2. 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers
  3. 2026AB-RAG: Adaptive Budgeted Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Question Answering
  4. 2024CONFLARE: CONFormal LArge language model REtrieval
  5. 2024Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation
  6. 2025Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level
  7. 2026A Systems-Level Analysis of Sensitivity, Robustness, and Stability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2025After Retrieval, Before Generation: Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation