Uncovering Hidden Violent Tendencies in LLMs: A Demographic Analysis via Behavioral Vignettes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for detecting and responding to violent content online, yet their ability to reason about morally ambiguous, real-world scenarios remains underexamined. We present the first study to evaluate LLMs using a validated social science instrument designed to measure human response to everyday conflict, namely the Violent Behavior Vignette Questionnaire (VBVQ). To assess potential bias, we introduce persona-based prompting that varies race, age, and geographic identity within the United States. Six LLMs developed across different geopolitical and organizational contexts are evaluated under a unified zero-shot setting. Our study reveals two key findings: (1) LLMs surface-level text generation often diverges from their internal preference for violent responses; (2) their violent tendencies vary across demographics, frequently contradicting established findings in criminology, social science, and psychology.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.
Builds on
7 of 47 references.
References · 7
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2023Generative Language Models Exhibit Social Identity Biasescited by 111
- 2024Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Trainingcited by 39
- 2021To Protect and To Serve? Analyzing Entity-Centric Framing of Police Violencecited by 12
- 2022Trigger Warnings: Bootstrapping a Violence Detector for FanFictioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.