mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging AI Graders for Missing Score Imputation to Achieve Accurate Ability Estimation in Constructed-Response Tests

arXiv 2506.20119 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the abilities of learners is a fundamental objective in the field of education. In particular, there is an increasing need to assess higher-order abilities such as expressive skills and logical thinking. Constructed-response tests such as short-answer and essay-based questions have become widely used as a method to meet this demand. Although these tests are effective, they require substantial manual grading, making them both labor-intensive and costly. Item response theory (IRT) provides a promising solution by enabling the estimation of ability from incomplete score data, where human raters grade only a subset of answers provided by learners across multiple test items. However, the accuracy of ability estimation declines as the proportion of missing scores increases. Although data augmentation techniques for imputing missing scores have been explored in order to address this limitation, they often struggle with inaccuracy for sparse or heterogeneous data. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a novel method for imputing missing scores by leveraging automated scoring technologies for accurate IRT-based ability estimation. The proposed method achieves high accuracy in ability estimation while markedly reducing manual grading workload.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.

Builds on

15 of 76 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  4. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  5. 2024Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generationcited by 63
  6. 2016Automatic Text Scoring Using Neural Networkscited by 51
  7. 2024Can Large Language Models Automatically Score Proficiency of Written Essays?cited by 35
  8. 2024Unleashing Large Language Models' Proficiency in Zero-shot Essay Scoringcited by 33
  9. 2023Transformed Distribution Matching for Missing Value Imputationcited by 31
  10. 2021A Survey of Knowledge Tracing: Models, Variants, and Applicationscited by 30
  11. 2023Prompt- and Trait Relation-aware Cross-prompt Essay Trait Scoringcited by 24
  12. 2018Neural Automated Essay Scoring and Coherence Modeling for Adversarially Crafted Inputcited by 16
3 more
  1. 2023Performance of the Pre-Trained Large Language Model GPT-4 on Automated Short Answer Gradingcited by 15
  2. 2019Automatic Short Answer Grading via Multiway Attention Networkscited by 8
  3. 2024Beyond Agreement: Diagnosing the Rationale Alignment of Automated Essay Scoring Methods based on Linguistically-informed Counterfactualscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.