mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PSALM-V: Automating Symbolic Planning in Interactive Visual Environments with Large Language Models

arXiv 2506.20097 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2025cs.RO cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose PSALM-V, the first autonomous neuro-symbolic learning system able to induce symbolic action semantics (i.e., pre- and post-conditions) in visual environments through interaction. PSALM-V bootstraps reliable symbolic planning without expert action definitions, using LLMs to generate heuristic plans and candidate symbolic semantics. Previous work has explored using large language models to generate action semantics for Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL)-based symbolic planners. However, these approaches have primarily focused on text-based domains or relied on unrealistic assumptions, such as access to a predefined problem file, full observability, or explicit error messages. By contrast, PSALM-V dynamically infers PDDL problem files and domain action semantics by analyzing execution outcomes and synthesizing possible error explanations. The system iteratively generates and executes plans while maintaining a tree-structured belief over possible action semantics for each action, iteratively refining these beliefs until a goal state is reached. Simulated experiments of task completion in ALFRED demonstrate that PSALM-V increases the plan success rate from 37% (Claude-3.7) to 74% in partially observed setups. Results on two 2D game environments, RTFM and Overcooked-AI, show that PSALM-V improves step efficiency and succeeds in domain induction in multi-agent settings. PSALM-V correctly induces PDDL pre- and post-conditions for real-world robot BlocksWorld tasks, despite low-level manipulation failures from the robot.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  3. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
  4. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  5. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  6. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 598
  7. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
  8. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 345
  9. 2023Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task Planningcited by 231
  10. 2023Leveraging Pre-trained Large Language Models to Construct and Utilize World Models for Model-based Task Planningcited by 204
  11. 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
  12. 2022VIOLA: Imitation Learning for Vision-Based Manipulation with Object Proposal Priorscited by 135
12 more
  1. 2021FILM: Following Instructions in Language with Modular Methodscited by 119
  2. 2021Learning to Synthesize Programs as Interpretable and Generalizable Policiescited by 59
  3. 2023SayCanPay: Heuristic Planning with Large Language Models using Learnable Domain Knowledgecited by 49
  4. 2024VisualPredicator: Learning Abstract World Models with Neuro-Symbolic Predicates for Robot Planningcited by 37
  5. 2023Deploying and Evaluating LLMs to Program Service Mobile Robotscited by 36
  6. 2023Learning adaptive planning representations with natural language guidancecited by 36
  7. 2019RTFM: Generalising to Novel Environment Dynamics via Readingcited by 33
  8. 2024InterPreT: Interactive Predicate Learning from Language Feedback for Generalizable Task Planningcited by 31
  9. 2024Generating consistent PDDL domains with Large Language Modelscited by 14
  10. 2024PDDLEGO: Iterative Planning in Textual Environmentscited by 14
  11. 2024Language Models can Infer Action Semantics for Symbolic Planners from Environment Feedbackcited by 8
  12. 2024Language-Augmented Symbolic Planner for Open-World Task Planningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.