mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Poly-Guard: Massive Multi-Domain Safety Policy-Grounded Guardrail Dataset

arXiv 2506.19054 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.CRcited by 14

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

As LLMs become widespread across diverse applications, concerns about the security and safety of LLM interactions have intensified. Numerous guardrail models and benchmarks have been developed to ensure LLM content safety. However, existing guardrail benchmarks are often built upon ad hoc risk taxonomies that lack a principled grounding in standardized safety policies, limiting their alignment with real-world operational requirements. Moreover, they tend to overlook domain-specific risks, while the same risk category can carry different implications across different domains. To bridge these gaps, we introduce Poly-Guard, the first massive multi-domain safety policy-grounded guardrail dataset. Poly-Guard offers: (1) broad domain coverage across eight safety-critical domains, such as finance, law, and codeGen; (2) policy-grounded risk construction based on authentic, domain-specific safety guidelines; (3) diverse interaction formats, encompassing declarative statements, questions, instructions, and multi-turn conversations; (4) advanced benign data curation via detoxification prompting to challenge over-refusal behaviors; and (5) attack-enhanced instances that simulate adversarial inputs designed to bypass guardrails. Based on Poly-Guard, we benchmark 19 advanced guardrail models and uncover a series of findings, such as: (1) All models achieve varied F1 scores, with many demonstrating high variance across risk categories, highlighting their limited domain coverage and insufficient handling of domain-specific safety concerns; (2) As models evolve, their coverage of safety risks broadens, but performance on common risk categories may decrease; (3) All models remain vulnerable to optimized adversarial attacks. We believe that dataset and the unique insights derived from our evaluations will advance the development of policy-aligned and resilient guardrail systems.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 11.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SafePyramid: A Hierarchical Benchmark for In-context Policy Guardrailing
  2. 2026ExpGuard: LLM Content Moderation in Specialized Domains
  3. 2025Aegis2.0: A Diverse AI Safety Dataset and Risks Taxonomy for Alignment of LLM Guardrails
  4. 2025Protect: Towards Robust Guardrailing Stack for Trustworthy Enterprise LLM Systems
  5. 2026Triaging Threats to Specialized Guardrails
  6. 2025GSPR: Aligning LLM Safeguards as Generalizable Safety Policy Reasoners
  7. 2026CHILLGuard: Towards Fine-Grained Chinese LLM Safety Guardrail with Scalable Data Construction and Model-aware Preference Alignment
  8. 2025PolyGuard: A Multilingual Safety Moderation Tool for 17 Languages