mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FORGE: An LLM-driven Framework for Large-Scale Smart Contract Vulnerability Dataset Construction

arXiv 2506.18795 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.SEcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality smart contract vulnerability datasets are critical for evaluating security tools and advancing smart contract security research. Two major limitations of current manual dataset construction are (1) labor-intensive and error-prone annotation processes limiting the scale, quality, and evolution of the dataset, and (2) absence of standardized classification rules results in inconsistent vulnerability categories and labeling results across different datasets. To address these limitations, we present FORGE, the first automated approach for constructing smart contract vulnerability datasets. FORGE leverages an LLM-driven pipeline to extract high-quality vulnerabilities from real-world audit reports and classify them according to the CWE, the most widely recognized classification in software security. FORGE employs a divide-and-conquer strategy to extract structured and self-contained vulnerability information from these reports. Additionally, it uses a tree-of-thoughts technique to classify the vulnerability information into the hierarchical CWE classification. To evaluate FORGE's effectiveness, we run FORGE on 6,454 real-world audit reports and generate a dataset comprising 81,390 solidity files and 27,497 vulnerability findings across 296 CWE categories. Manual assessment of the dataset demonstrates high extraction precision and classification consistency with human experts (precision of 95.6% and inter-rater agreement k-α of 0.87). We further validate the practicality of our dataset by benchmarking 13 existing security tools on our dataset. The results reveal the significant limitations in current detection capabilities. Furthermore, by analyzing the severity-frequency distribution patterns through a unified CWE perspective in our dataset, we highlight inconsistency between current smart contract research focus and priorities identified from real-world vulnerabilities...

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026On the Shoulders of Giants: Empowering Automated Smart Contract Auditing via the GiAnt Corpus ↗
  2. 2026Decoupled Smart Contract Audits: Lightweight LLM Framework via Distillation and Aggregation
  3. 2025Large Language Model based Smart Contract Auditing with LLMBugScanner
  4. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation Integrated Large Language Models in Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
  5. 2025Out of Distribution, Out of Luck: How Well Can LLMs Trained on Vulnerability Datasets Detect Top 25 CWE Weaknesses?
  6. 2024LLM-SmartAudit: Advanced Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
  7. 2025SAEL: Leveraging Large Language Models with Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
  8. 2024ContractTinker: LLM-Empowered Vulnerability Repair for Real-World Smart Contracts