Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Inverse Design in Photonic Integrated Circuits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inverse design of photonic integrated circuits (PICs) has traditionally relied on gradientbased optimization. However, this approach is prone to end up in local minima, which results in suboptimal design functionality. As interest in PICs increases due to their potential for addressing modern hardware demands through optical computing, more adaptive optimization algorithms are needed. We present a reinforcement learning (RL) environment as well as multi-agent RL algorithms for the design of PICs. By discretizing the design space into a grid, we formulate the design task as an optimization problem with thousands of binary variables. We consider multiple two- and three-dimensional design tasks that represent PIC components for an optical computing system. By decomposing the design space into thousands of individual agents, our algorithms are able to optimize designs with only a few thousand environment samples. They outperform previous state-of-the-art gradient-based optimization in both twoand three-dimensional design tasks. Our work may also serve as a benchmark for further exploration of sample-efficient RL for inverse design in photonics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.
Builds on
21 of 66 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
- 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 288
- 2022The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 247
- 2019Soft Actor-Critic for Discrete Action Settingscited by 174
9 more
- 2019CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and Simplicitycited by 95
- 2020Munchausen Reinforcement Learningcited by 69
- 2021SGD Generalizes Better Than GD (And Regularization Doesn't Help)cited by 38
- 2023The physics of optical computingcited by 33
- 2021PyGAD: An Intuitive Genetic Algorithm Python Librarycited by 25
- 2022Overcoming the Spectral Bias of Neural Value Approximationcited by 19
- 2023Reinforcement Learning for Photonic Component Designcited by 2
- 2021A Reinforcement learning method for Optical Thin-Film Designcited by 1
- 2024Mastering Zero-Shot Interactions in Cooperative and Competitive Simultaneous Gamescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Learning Design Skills as Memory Policies for Agentic Photonic Inverse Design
- 2024Inverse Design of Photonic Crystal Surface Emitting Lasers is a Sequence Modeling Problem
- 2026When Every Simulation Counts: Value-Based Reinforcement Learning for Accelerated Photonics Inverse Design
- 2024Model-free reinforcement learning with noisy actions for automated experimental control in optics
- 2025AI Agents for Photonic Integrated Circuit Design Automation
- 2025An Agentic Framework for Autonomous Metamaterial Modeling and Inverse Design
- 2026Lighthouse RL: Sample-Efficient Circuit Optimization via Strategic Reset Points
- 2025Model-free Optical Processors using In Situ Reinforcement Learning with Proximal Policy Optimization