mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fine-Tuned Vision Transformers Capture Complex Wheat Spike Morphology for Volume Estimation from RGB Images

arXiv 2506.18060 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating three-dimensional morphological traits such as volume from two-dimensional RGB images presents inherent challenges due to the loss of depth information, projection distortions, and occlusions under field conditions. In this work, we explore multiple approaches for non-destructive volume estimation of wheat spikes using RGB images and structured-light 3D scans as ground truth references. Wheat spike volume is promising for phenotyping as it shows high correlation with spike dry weight, a key component of fruiting efficiency. Accounting for the complex geometry of the spikes, we compare different neural network approaches for volume estimation from 2D images and benchmark them against two conventional baselines: a 2D area-based projection and a geometric reconstruction using axis-aligned cross-sections. Fine-tuned Vision Transformers (DINOv2 and DINOv3) with MLPs achieve the lowest MAPE of 5.08% and 4.67% and the highest correlation of 0.96 and 0.97 on six-view indoor images, outperforming fine-tuned CNNs (ResNet18 and ResNet50), wheat-specific backbones, and both baselines. When using frozen DINO backbones, deep-supervised LSTMs outperform MLPs, whereas after fine-tuning, improved high-level representations allow simple MLPs to outperform LSTMs. We demonstrate that object shape significantly impacts volume estimation accuracy, with irregular geometries such as wheat spikes posing greater challenges for geometric methods than for deep learning approaches. Fine-tuning DINOv3 on field-based single side-view images yields a MAPE of 8.39% and a correlation of 0.90, providing a novel pipeline and a fast, accurate, and non-destructive approach for wheat spike volume phenotyping.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2025.

Builds on

15 of 71 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  6. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  7. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,803
  8. 2018Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processingcited by 721
  9. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  10. 2018Free-Form Image Inpainting with Gated Convolutioncited by 594
  11. 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
  12. 2019Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Visioncited by 94
3 more
  1. 2022Balanced MSE for Imbalanced Visual Regressioncited by 89
  2. 2017Two-view 3D Reconstruction for Food Volume Estimationcited by 19
  3. 2025Wheat3DGS: In-field 3D Reconstruction, Instance Segmentation and Phenotyping of Wheat Heads with Gaussian Splattingcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.