TROJAN-GUARD: Hardware Trojans Detection Using GNN in RTL Designs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Chip manufacturing is a complex process, and to achieve a faster time to market, an increasing number of untrusted third-party tools and designs from around the world are being utilized. The use of these untrusted third party intellectual properties (IPs) and tools increases the risk of adversaries inserting hardware trojans (HTs). The covert nature of HTs poses significant threats to cyberspace, potentially leading to severe consequences for national security, the economy, and personal privacy. Many graph neural network (GNN)-based HT detection methods have been proposed. However, they perform poorly on larger designs because they rely on training with smaller designs. Additionally, these methods do not explore different GNN models that are well-suited for HT detection or provide efficient training and inference processes. We propose a novel framework that generates graph embeddings for large designs (e.g., RISC-V) and incorporates various GNN models tailored for HT detection. Furthermore, our framework introduces domain-specific techniques for efficient training and inference by implementing model quantization. Model quantization reduces the precision of the weights, lowering the computational requirements, enhancing processing speed without significantly affecting detection accuracy. We evaluate our framework using a custom dataset, and our results demonstrate a precision of 98.66% and a recall (true positive rate) of 92.30%, highlighting the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach in detecting hardware trojans in large-scale chip designs
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2025.
Builds on
13 of 37 references.
References · 13
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
- 2023SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compressioncited by 367
- 2023LLM for SoC Security: A Paradigm Shiftcited by 22
- 2024LLM4SecHW: Leveraging Domain Specific Large Language Model for Hardware Debuggingcited by 18
- 2021HW2VEC: A Graph Learning Tool for Automating Hardware Securitycited by 16
- 2018Online Planner Selection with Graph Neural Networks and Adaptive Schedulingcited by 13
- 2022Hardware Trojan Detection using Graph Neural Networkscited by 8
- 2021Node-wise Hardware Trojan Detection Based on Graph Learningcited by 4
1 more
- 2024Choosing a Classical Planner with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Graph Neural Networks for Hardware Vulnerability Analysis -- Can you Trust your GNN?
- 2026GRAFT: Graphlet-Triggered Backdoor Attack on GNN-Based Hardware Security Systems ↗
- 2024AttackGNN: Red-Teaming GNNs in Hardware Security Using Reinforcement Learning
- 2024TrojanForge: Generating Adversarial Hardware Trojan Examples Using Reinforcement Learning
- 2026TrojanGYM: A Detector-in-the-Loop LLM for Adaptive RTL Hardware Trojan Insertion
- 2026Leaking Circuit Secrets: Gradient Leakage Attacks on Graph Neural Networks
- 2023PoisonedGNN: Backdoor Attack on Graph Neural Networks-based Hardware Security Systems
- 2024TrojanWhisper: Evaluating Pre-trained LLMs to Detect and Localize Hardware Trojans