mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Fundamental Limits for Active Multi-distribution Learning

arXiv 2506.17607 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-distribution learning extends agnostic Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning to the setting in which a family of k distributions, Dii∈[k], is considered and a classifier's performance is measured by its error under the worst distribution. This problem has attracted a lot of recent interests due to its applications in collaborative learning, fairness, and robustness. Despite a rather complete picture of sample complexity of passive multi-distribution learning, research on active multi-distribution learning remains scarce, with algorithms whose optimality remaining unknown. In this paper, we develop new algorithms for active multi-distribution learning and establish improved label complexity upper and lower bounds, in distribution-dependent and distribution-free settings. Specifically, in the near-realizable setting we prove an upper bound of widetildeOBigl(θmax(d+k)lnfrac1varepsilonBigr) and widetildeOBigl(θmax(d+k)Bigl(lnfrac1varepsilon+fracnu2varepsilon2Bigr)+fracknuvarepsilon2Bigr) in the realizable and agnostic settings respectively, where θmax is the maximum disagreement coefficient among the k distributions, d is the VC dimension of the hypothesis class, nu is the multi-distribution error of the best hypothesis, and varepsilon is the target excess error. Moreover, we show that the bound in the realizable setting is information-theoretically optimal and that the knu/varepsilon2 term in the agnostic setting is fundamental for proper learners. We also establish instance-dependent sample complexity bound for passive multidistribution learning that smoothly interpolates between realizable and agnostic regimes~citepblum2017collaborative,zhang2024optimal, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2025.

Builds on

23 of 58 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  2. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
  3. 2021Distributionally Robust Federated Averagingcited by 104
  4. 2020Fairness-aware Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 87
  5. 2014Minimax Analysis of Active Learningcited by 61
  6. 2021Multi-group Agnostic PAC Learnabilitycited by 42
  7. 2017Active Learning for Cost-Sensitive Classificationcited by 40
  8. 2022On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributionscited by 39
  9. 2017Active classification with comparison queriescited by 27
  10. 2014Beyond Disagreement-based Agnostic Active Learningcited by 21
  11. 2022Efficient Active Learning with Abstentioncited by 21
  12. 2018Improved Algorithms for Collaborative PAC Learningcited by 20
11 more
  1. 2019The Power of Comparisons for Actively Learning Linear Classifierscited by 20
  2. 2015Efficient and Parsimonious Agnostic Active Learningcited by 17
  3. 2018Tight Bounds for Collaborative PAC Learning via Multiplicative Weightscited by 15
  4. 2023Optimal Multi-Distribution Learningcited by 13
  5. 2023Selective Sampling and Imitation Learning via Online Regressioncited by 12
  6. 2023The sample complexity of multi-distribution learningcited by 12
  7. 2014A Compression Technique for Analyzing Disagreement-Based Active Learningcited by 11
  8. 2017Diameter-Based Active Learningcited by 7
  9. 2023Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learningcited by 6
  10. 2023A Competitive Algorithm for Agnostic Active Learningcited by 2
  11. 2023Distribution-Dependent Rates for Multi-Distribution Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.