mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DuaShepherd: Integrating Stepwise Correctness and Potential Rewards for Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv 2506.17533 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose DuaShepherd, a novel reward modeling framework that integrates two complementary reward signals, correctness and potential, to enhance the mathematical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). While correctness-based signals emphasize identification of stepwise errors, potential-based signals focus on the likelihood of reaching the correct final answer. We developed an automated pipeline for constructing large-scale reward modeling dataset with both signals. A unified, multi-head architecture was explored to train the two reward models in a multi-task setup, demonstrating benefits from learning both correctness and potential in parallel. By combining these two signals into a compound probability, our model achieves consistent performance improvements across multiple benchmarks. Empirical evaluations on MATH500 and ProcessBench confirm that this combined reward significantly outperforms models trained on either reward type alone, achieving state-of-the-art performance under comparable resource constraints.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2025.

Builds on

26 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  2. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning9 Dec
  3. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
  4. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov

Other references · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  7. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  8. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  9. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
  10. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
  11. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  12. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
10 more
  1. 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 282
  2. 2023Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Futurecited by 184
  3. 2024VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMscited by 183
  4. 2024Accessing GPT-4 level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8Bcited by 158
  5. 2023MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoningcited by 156
  6. 2024RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-Foldcited by 99
  7. 2024Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 72
  8. 2024Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performancecited by 39
  9. 2024Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Better Solvers for Math Word Problemscited by 31
  10. 2024Reason from Fallacy: Enhancing Large Language Models' Logical Reasoning through Logical Fallacy Understandingcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Let's Reinforce Step by Step
  2. 2025Right Is Not Enough: The Pitfalls of Outcome Supervision in Training LLMs for Math Reasoning
  3. 2025The Climb Carves Wisdom Deeper Than the Summit: On the Noisy Rewards in Learning to Reason
  4. 2025The Good, The Bad, and The Hybrid: A Reward Structure Showdown in Reasoning Models Training
  5. 2024Evaluating Robustness of Reward Models for Mathematical Reasoning
  6. 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling
  7. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning
  8. 2026The Quality-Utility Paradox: Why High-Reward Data Impairs Small Model Mathematical Reasoning